<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" standalone="no"?>
<GmsArticle>
  <MetaData>
    <Identifier>zma000850</Identifier>
    <IdentifierDoi>10.3205/zma000850</IdentifierDoi>
    <IdentifierUrn>urn:nbn:de:0183-zma0008506</IdentifierUrn>
    <IdentifierVgWort>http://vg09.met.vgwort.de/na/f2f8695d98ce4fe987c9acfa6720e3e9</IdentifierVgWort>
    <ArticleType language="en">research article</ArticleType>
    <ArticleType language="de">Forschungsarbeit</ArticleType>
    <TitleGroup>
      <Title language="en">Is there a &#8220;net generation&#8221; in veterinary medicine&#63; A comparative study on the use of the Internet and Web 2.0 by students and the veterinary profession</Title>
      <TitleTranslated language="de">Gibt es eine &#8222;net-Generation&#8220; in der Tiermedizin&#63; Eine Vergleichende Untersuchung zur Nutzung von Internet und Web 2.0 bei Studierenden und der Tier&#228;rzteschaft</TitleTranslated>
    </TitleGroup>
    <CreatorList>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Tenhaven</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Tenhaven</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Christoph</Firstname>
          <Initials>C</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">Stiftung Tier&#228;rztliche Hochschule Hannover, E-Learning Beratung, B&#252;nteweg 2, 30559 Hannover, Deutschland<Affiliation>Stiftung Tier&#228;rztliche Hochschule Hannover, E-Learning Beratung, Hannover, Deutschland</Affiliation></Address>
        <Address language="de">University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, E-Learning, B&#252;nteweg 2, 30559 Hannover, Germany<Affiliation>University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, E-Learning, Hannover, Germany</Affiliation></Address>
        <Email>macleguan&#64;gmail.com</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="yes" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Tipold</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Tipold</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Andrea</Firstname>
          <Initials>A</Initials>
          <AcademicTitle>Prof. Dr.</AcademicTitle>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>Stiftung Tier&#228;rztliche Hochschule Hannover, Klinik f&#252;r Kleintiere, Hannover, Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Email>andrea.tipold&#64;tiho-hannover.de</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Fischer</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Fischer</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Martin R.</Firstname>
          <Initials>MR</Initials>
          <AcademicTitle>Prod. Dr. med.</AcademicTitle>
          <AcademicTitleSuffix>MME</AcademicTitleSuffix>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>Klinikum der LMU M&#252;nchen, Lehrstuhl f&#252;r Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, M&#252;nchen, Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>Munich University Hospital, LMU University Munich, Chair for medical Education, Munich, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Email>martin.fischer&#64;med.uni-muenchen.de</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Ehlers</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Ehlers</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Jan P.</Firstname>
          <Initials>JP</Initials>
          <AcademicTitle>Dr. med. vet.</AcademicTitle>
          <AcademicTitleSuffix>M.A.</AcademicTitleSuffix>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>Stiftung Tier&#228;rztliche Hochschule Hannover, E-Learning Beratung, Hannover, Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, E-Learning, Hannover, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Email>jan.ehlers&#64;tiho-hannover.de</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
    </CreatorList>
    <PublisherList>
      <Publisher>
        <Corporation>
          <Corporatename>German Medical Science GMS Publishing House</Corporatename>
        </Corporation>
        <Address>D&#252;sseldorf</Address>
      </Publisher>
    </PublisherList>
    <SubjectGroup>
      <SubjectheadingDDB>610</SubjectheadingDDB>
      <Keyword language="en">web2.0</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">social media</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">veterinary medicine</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">education</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">E-Learning</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">Lifelong Learning</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">professional training</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">net-generation</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">digital natives</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Web2.0</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Soziale Medien</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Tiermedizin</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Lehre</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">E-Learning</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Lebenslanges Lernen</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Fortbildung</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Netzgeneration</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Digital Natives</Keyword>
      <SectionHeading language="en">medicine</SectionHeading>
      <SectionHeading language="de">Tiermedizin</SectionHeading>
    </SubjectGroup>
    <DateReceived>20120716</DateReceived>
    <DateRevised>20120910</DateRevised>
    <DateAccepted>20120910</DateAccepted>
    <DatePublishedList>
      
    <DatePublished>20130221</DatePublished><DateRepublished>20131002</DateRepublished></DatePublishedList>
    <Language>engl</Language>
    <LanguageTranslation>germ</LanguageTranslation>
    <SourceGroup>
      <Journal>
        <ISSN>1860-3572</ISSN>
        <Volume>30</Volume>
        <Issue>1</Issue>
        <JournalTitle>GMS Zeitschrift f&#252;r Medizinische Ausbildung</JournalTitle>
        <JournalTitleAbbr>GMS Z Med Ausbild</JournalTitleAbbr>
        <IssueTitle>Einsatz von Social Media und Web 2.0 in der (tier/zahn)medizinischen Aus- und Fortbildung</IssueTitle>
      </Journal>
    </SourceGroup>
    <ArticleNo>7</ArticleNo>
    <Correction><DateLastCorrection>20131002</DateLastCorrection>Z&#228;hlpixel in Datenbank</Correction>
  </MetaData>
  <OrigData>
    <Abstract language="de" linked="yes"><Pgraph><Mark1>Einleitung:</Mark1> Informelles und formelles lebenslanges Lernen ist im Studium und Beruf essenziell. Dazu k&#246;nnen neben der klassischen Fortbildung auch Web 2.0 Tools benutzt werden. Umstritten in der Literatur ist allerdings, ob es unter den &#8222;Unter 30 J&#228;hrigen&#8220; eine sogenannte Net-Generation gibt. </Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Ziel: </Mark1>&#220;berpr&#252;fung der Hypothese, dass eine Net-Generation unter Studierenden und jungen Tier&#228;rzten existiert. </Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Methode:</Mark1> Eine Onlineumfrage unter Studierenden und der Tier&#228;rzteschaft wurde im deutschsprachigen Raum durchgef&#252;hrt, die per Onlinemedien und klassischen Printmedien beworben wurde.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Ergebnisse:</Mark1> An der Befragung haben 1780 Personen teilgenommen. Es gibt unterschiedliches Nutzungsverhalten von Studierenden und der Tier&#228;rzteschaft bei sozialen Netzwerken (91,9&#37; vs. 69&#37;) und IMs (55,9&#37; vs. 24,5&#37;). Alle Tools wurden haupts&#228;chlich passiv und privat genutzt, im geringeren Ma&#223;e auch f&#252;r den Beruf und das Studium.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Ausblick: </Mark1>Der Einsatz von Web 2.0 Tools ist sinnvoll, jedoch ist eine Vermittlung von Informations- und Medienkompetenz, Erstellung von Verhaltensregeln im Internet und &#220;berpr&#252;fung von &#8222;user generated content&#8220; essentiell.</Pgraph></Abstract>
    <Abstract language="en" linked="yes"><Pgraph><Mark1>Introduction:</Mark1> Informal and formal lifelong learning is essential at university and in the workplace. Apart from classical learning techniques, Web 2.0 tools can be used. It is controversial whether there is a so-called net generation amongst people under 30.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Aims: </Mark1>To test the hypothesis that a net generation among students and young veterinarians exists.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Methods:</Mark1> An online survey of students and veterinarians was conducted in the German-speaking countries which was advertised via online media and traditional print media.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Results: </Mark1>1780 people took part in the survey. Students and veterinarians have different usage patterns regarding social networks (91.9&#37; vs. 69&#37;) and IM (55.9&#37; vs. 24.5&#37;). All tools were predominantly used passively and in private, to a lesser extent also professionally and for studying.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Outlook: </Mark1>The use of Web 2.0 tools is useful, however, teaching information and media skills, preparing codes of conduct for the internet and verification of user generated content is essential.</Pgraph></Abstract>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Introduction">
      <MainHeadline>Introduction</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Every is being encouraged towards lifelong learning (<Hyperlink href="http:&#47;&#47;www.voced.edu.au&#47;content&#47;ngv35226">http:&#47;&#47;www.voced.edu.au&#47;content&#47;ngv35226</Hyperlink>); <TextLink reference="72"></TextLink>. This is in particular compulsory for the medical profession <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="71"></TextLink> and vets <TextLink reference="48"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="89"></TextLink>. In order not to fall behind the professional quality standards, ongoing training is required. Even early on in someone&#8217;s professional career this is necessary because there is a fear that the knowledge acquired at university could quickly become obsolete <TextLink reference="63"></TextLink>. Ramsay et. al. <TextLink reference="70"></TextLink> and Shekelle et al. <TextLink reference="81"></TextLink> assume a half-life of about five years for medical knowledge.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Although preparation for lifelong learning should take place, as much as possible, while still studying <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, this frequently has not been implemented appropriately <TextLink reference="80"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Lifelong learning in medical and veterinary under- and postgraduate education takes many forms <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>. Seminars, lectures, journal articles <TextLink reference="40"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="57"></TextLink> but also e-learning <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink> are amongst the preferred study media.</Pgraph><Pgraph>We distinguish between formal training with certification (CME, ATF) <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>) and informal training (from pure interest or for problem solving) <TextLink reference="41"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="87"></TextLink>. Likewise, the forms of motivation differ, some study to obtain a certificate or to fulfil the CPD requirements (extrinsic motivation), some from pure interest in the topic (intrinsic motivation) <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="46"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>For some years now, a new generation of learners (Net Generation <TextLink reference="87"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="76"></TextLink>, Generation &#64; <TextLink reference="64"></TextLink>, Homo Zappiens <TextLink reference="92"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="93"></TextLink> or Digital Natives <TextLink reference="68"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="43"></TextLink>) has been expected by universities, with the assumption that they will prove to be a profound challenge to teaching <TextLink reference="75"></TextLink>, as they learn and think differently <TextLink reference="68"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Other authors take a contrary position, stating there is no empirical basis for grouping together a &#8220;net generation&#8221; as young people exhibited a much more nuanced usage behaviour and were using modern communication technology not because they exist but to satisfy their own needs <TextLink reference="79"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>. Other authors point out that, despite differences in media habits, personal attitudes and preferences this issue needs to be explored further <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="52"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Learning and CPD using electronic media in medicine and veterinary medicine has become commonplace and there is great demand for it <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="56"></TextLink> as it solves various problems which can occur as a result of on-site teaching: seminar costs, travel costs, lack of time or not being able to organise cover at the workplace <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>. Web 2.0 technology is gaining more and more importance for informal learning <TextLink reference="66"></TextLink> Web 2.0 refers to internet use which has moved away from mere consumption to so-called prosumption and the technologies necessary for it. This means that users not only obtain information from the internet, but are actively involved in creating, processing and disseminating content <TextLink reference="54"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="65"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="69"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="85"></TextLink>. Web 2.0 tools include web forums, social networks, blogs, instant messaging, wikis and podcasts:</Pgraph><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1"><Mark2>Internet forum:</Mark2> A virtual space on the internet which facilitates discussions and their archiving. The discussion usually does not take place in real time, but asynchronously <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. </ListItem><ListItem level="1"><Mark2>Social network:</Mark2> A social network is defined as a web service where users log on, connect with each other and upload their own content and share with other users of similar primary areas of interest and are able to comment on third-party content <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>.</ListItem><ListItem level="1"><Mark2>Blog: </Mark2>A public web diary or journal, also referred to as a web-log <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>. </ListItem><ListItem level="1"><Mark2>Instant messaging: </Mark2>Using instant messaging, two or more participants can hold a real-time conversation using text messages via so-called &#8220;push function&#8221;. An instant messenger (IM) is a computer program which must be installed by all participants of the discussion, the so-called &#8220;chat&#8221;. A buddy list allows users to see whether users known to them are online and willing to communicate <TextLink reference="42"></TextLink>.</ListItem><ListItem level="1"><Mark2>Wiki: </Mark2>Software which supports collaborative work on the internet with page content which can be changed by any user via editing the content in their browser and with the further option of engaging in discussion with other users <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>.</ListItem><ListItem level="1"><Mark2>Podcasts:</Mark2> Audio and video files which can be subscribed to, usually via an RSS Feed <TextLink reference="56"></TextLink>. </ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><Pgraph>These Web 2.0 tools are mainly used in veterinary medicine to get quick access to international experts&#8217; opinions and to overcome availability obstacles (e.g. time, distance and cost) <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>. It is said of the above-mentioned net generation that they are particularly keen users of such Web 2.0 tools <TextLink reference="87"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="68"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="93"></TextLink>. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Einleitung">
      <MainHeadline>Einleitung</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Alle Menschen sind aufgerufen, lebenslang zu lernen &#91;<Hyperlink href="http:&#47;&#47;www.voced.edu.au&#47;content&#47;ngv35226">http:&#47;&#47;www.voced.edu.au&#47;content&#47;ngv35226</Hyperlink>&#93;, <TextLink reference="72"></TextLink>. Verpflichtend ist dies besonders f&#252;r Mediziner <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="71"></TextLink> und Veterin&#228;rmediziner <TextLink reference="48"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="89"></TextLink>. Um nicht hinter den beruflichen Qualit&#228;tsstandards zur&#252;ckzufallen, ist eine st&#228;ndige Weiterbildung erforderlich. Auch schon fr&#252;h im Berufsleben ist dies notwendig, da zu bef&#252;rchten steht, dass die im Studium erworbenen Kenntnisse rasch veralten <TextLink reference="63"></TextLink>. Ramsay et. al. <TextLink reference="70"></TextLink> und Shekelle et al. <TextLink reference="81"></TextLink> gehen von einer Halbwertszeit des medizinischen Wissens von ungef&#228;hr f&#252;nf Jahren aus .</Pgraph><Pgraph>Eine Vorbereitung auf lebenslanges Lernen sollte soweit m&#246;glich schon im Studium erfolgen <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, wurde aber vielfach nicht angemessen umgesetzt <TextLink reference="80"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Das lebenslange Lernen in der medizinischen und tiermedizinischen Weiter- und Fortbildung findet unterschiedlich statt <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>. Seminare, Pr&#228;senzveranstaltungen, Zeitschriftenartikel <TextLink reference="40"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="57"></TextLink> aber auch E-Learning <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="40"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink> geh&#246;ren zu den bevorzugt gew&#228;hlten Lernmedien.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Dabei ist zwischen formaler Fortbildung mit Zertifizierung (CME, ATF) <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink> und informeller Fortbildung (aus reinem Interesse oder zur Probleml&#246;sung) <TextLink reference="41"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="86"></TextLink> zu unterscheiden. Ebenso sind auch die Motivationsformen hier unterschiedlich: Teilweise wird zur Erlangung eines Zertifikates oder zur Erf&#252;llung der Fortbildungspflicht gelernt (extrinsische Motivation), teilweise aus reinem Interesse an den Inhalten (intrinsische Motivation) <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="46"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Seit einigen Jahren wird eine neue Generation von Lernenden (net-Generation <TextLink reference="87"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="76"></TextLink>, Generation &#64; <TextLink reference="64"></TextLink>, Homo Zappiens <TextLink reference="92"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="93"></TextLink> oder Digital Natives <TextLink reference="68"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="43"></TextLink>) an den Hochschulen erwartet, die die Lehre vor neue tiefgreifende Herausforderungen stellen werde <TextLink reference="75"></TextLink>, weil sie anders lerne und denke <TextLink reference="68"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Andere Autoren vertreten eine Gegenposition: F&#252;r die Zusammenfassung zu einer &#8222;net-Generation&#8220; fehlten die empirischen Grundlagen, die Jugendlichen h&#228;tten ein viel differenzierteres Nutzungsverhalten und nutzten die modernen Kommunikationstechnologien nicht, weil es sie gebe, sondern um eigene Bed&#252;rfnisse zu befriedigen <TextLink reference="79"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>. Andere Autoren weisen darauf hin, dass trotz gewisser Unterschiede im Medienverhalten bzw. ihrer pers&#246;nlichen Einstellungen und Pr&#228;ferenzen dieses Thema weiter zu erforschen sei <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="52"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Das Lernen und Fortbilden mit elektronischen Medien ist in der Medizin und Tiermedizin allt&#228;glich geworden und es herrscht gro&#223;e Nachfrage danach <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="56"></TextLink>, da damit Probleme gel&#246;st werden, die w&#228;hrend einer Pr&#228;senzveranstaltung auftreten k&#246;nnen: Seminarkosten, Reisekosten, Zeitmangel oder das Fehlen einer Praxisvertretung <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>. Web 2.0 Technologien werden immer wichtiger beim informellen Lernen <TextLink reference="66"></TextLink> Web 2.0 bezeichnet dabei eine Nutzung des Internets weg von reinen Konsumenten zu sogenannten Prosumenten und die dazu notwendigen Technologien. Dies bedeutet, dass die Nutzer nicht nur Informationen aus dem Internet beziehen, sondern aktiv an der Erstellung, Verbreitung und Bearbeitung von Inhalten beteiligt sind <TextLink reference="54"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="65"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="69"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="85"></TextLink>. Web 2.0 Werkzeuge sind unter anderem Internetforen, soziale Netzwerke, Blogs, Instant Messenger, Wikis und Podcasts:</Pgraph><Pgraph><UnorderedList><ListItem level="1"><Mark2>Internetforum: </Mark2>Ein virtueller Platz im Internet, der Diskussionen erm&#246;glicht und diese auch archiviert. Die Diskussion findet meist nicht in Echtzeit, sondern asynchron, statt <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>. </ListItem><ListItem level="1"><Mark2>Soziales Netzwerk:</Mark2> Als soziales Netzwerk bezeichnet man einen Webdienst, bei dem sich Benutzer anmelden, miteinander vernetzen und eigene Inhalte einstellen und mit anderen Benutzern mit &#228;hnlichen Interessensschwerpunkten teilen und fremde Inhalte kommentieren k&#246;nnen <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>.</ListItem><ListItem level="1"><Mark2>Blog: </Mark2>Ein &#246;ffentliches Tagebuch oder Journal im Internet, das auch Web-Log genannt wird <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>. </ListItem><ListItem level="1"><Mark2>Instant Messenger: </Mark2>&#220;ber das Instant-Messaging k&#246;nnen sich zwei oder mehr Gespr&#228;chsteilnehmer per Textnachricht synchron, in Echtzeit, &#252;ber die sogenannte &#8222;Pushfunktion&#8220; austauschen. Der Instant-Messenger (IM) ist ein Computerprogramm, das alle Teilnehmenden der Diskussion, des Chats, installiert haben m&#252;ssen. &#220;ber eine sogenannte &#8222;Buddylist&#8220; k&#246;nnen die Nutzer einsehen, ob ihnen bekannte Nutzer gerade &#8222;online&#8220; sind und bereit sind, mit ihnen in Kontakt zu treten <TextLink reference="42"></TextLink>.</ListItem><ListItem level="1"><Mark2>Wiki: </Mark2>Eine Software zur Unterst&#252;tzung des kooperativen Arbeitens im Internet, deren Seiteninhalte jeder Benutzer &#228;ndern kann, indem er den Inhalt in seinem Browser editiert und dazu zus&#228;tzlich in Diskussion mit anderen Nutzern gehen kann <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>.</ListItem><ListItem level="1"><Mark2>Podcasts:</Mark2> Audio- und Videodateien, die meist &#252;ber ein RSS-Feed abonniert werden k&#246;nnen <TextLink reference="56"></TextLink>. </ListItem></UnorderedList></Pgraph><Pgraph>Diese Web 2.0 Werkzeuge werden in der Tiermedizin vor allem dazu genutzt, um schnellen Zugang zu internationalen Expertenmeinungen zu bekommen und  Verf&#252;gbarkeitshindernisse (u.a. Zeit, Entfernung und Kosten) zu &#252;berwinden <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>. Der oben propagierten net-Generation wird eine besonders intensive Nutzung solcher Web 2.0 Werkzeuge nachgesagt <TextLink reference="87"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="68"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="93"></TextLink>. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Aims">
      <MainHeadline>Aims</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The aim of this study was to determine whether a so-called &#8220;net generation&#8221; is evident in veterinary medicine. Are there differences in media use, especially of the internet and Web 2.0 media between students of veterinary medicine and the veterinary profession in German-speaking countries&#63; Based on the results, we will draw conclusions about how veterinary medical educational institutions should approach the use of new media.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Ziel">
      <MainHeadline>Ziel</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Ziel dieser Studie war es, herauszufinden, ob in der Tiermedizin eine so genannte &#8222;net-Generation&#8220; erkennbar ist. Bestehen Unterschiede in der Mediennutzung, speziell des Internets und der Web 2.0-Medien zwischen Studierenden der Tiermedizin und der Tier&#228;rzteschaft im deutschsprachigen Raum&#63; Aus den Ergebnissen sollen Schlussfolgerungen entwickelt werden, wie die tiermedizinischen Bildungseinrichtungen mit dem Einsatz neuer Medien umgehen sollten. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Methods">
      <MainHeadline>Methods</MainHeadline><Pgraph>To answer this question, an online questionnaire was developed. In addition to personal date, the hardware owned, frequency of internet use and usage patterns in relation to Web 2.0 applications (messaging, blogs, wikis, forums, podcasts, etc.) was queried. In addition, the frequency of internet use via mobile phones was queried, which takes place mainly within this age group.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The questionnaire consisted of 23 multiple choice questions, 15 single choice questions, eight questions with Likert scales (values 1-6, 1&#61;yes, a lot to 6&#61;never) and three free text questions. These questions were part of a larger overall questionnaire on media use in veterinary medicine. Other partial results have already been published elsewhere <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="55"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The survey was conducted via an online questionnaire on <Hyperlink href="http:&#47;&#47;www.surveymonkey.com">http:&#47;&#47;www.surveymonkey.com</Hyperlink>  over a period of 42 days and was open to all vets and students of veterinary medicine in Germany. This survey was advertised on the internet (via the mailing lists of the various educational institutions, on internet forums such as <Hyperlink href="http:&#47;&#47;www.Foren4vet.de">http:&#47;&#47;www.Foren4vet.de</Hyperlink>, Twitter and social networks) and in traditional print media (German Veterinary Journal, TiHo Anzeiger, Vetimpulse). As part of the survey, participants were all informed about the aim of the survey and agreed to the evaluation and publication of data in the context of the research projects of the School of Veterinary Medicine Foundation.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Statistical analysis was performed directly in the SurveyMonkey questionnaire tool and after downloading the data using the statistical program SPSS 20.0.0 IBM.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Methoden">
      <MainHeadline>Methoden</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Um diese Fragestellung beantworten zu k&#246;nnen, wurde ein Onlinefragebogen entwickelt. Hierin wurden neben personenbezogenen Fragen die Hardwareausstattung, die Frequenz der Internetnutzung sowie das Nutzungsverhalten in Bezug auf Web 2.0 Applikationen (Messenger, Blogs, Wikis, Foren, Podcasts etc.) erfragt. Des Weiteren wurde auch nach der Nutzungsh&#228;ufigkeit des Internets &#252;ber Mobiltelefone gefragt und in welcher Altersgruppe dies vornehmlich geschieht. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Der Fragebogen bestand aus 23 Multiple-Choice-Fragen, 15 Single-Choice-Fragen, acht Fragen mit Likertwerten (Likert-Werte, 1-6, 1&#61; ja, sehr bis 6&#61;nie) und drei Freitextfragen. Diese Fragen waren Teil eines umfangreicheren Gesamtfragebogens zur Mediennutzung in der Tiermedizin. Andere Teilergebnisse wurden bereits an anderer Stelle ver&#246;ffentlicht <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="55"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Befragung erfolgte &#252;ber einen Onlinefragebogen auf <Hyperlink href="http:&#47;&#47;www.surveymonkey.com">http:&#47;&#47;www.surveymonkey.com</Hyperlink> &#252;ber einen Zeitraum von 42 Tagen und richtete sich an alle Tier&#228;rztinnen&#47;Tier&#228;rzte und Studierende der Tiermedizin im deutschsprachigen Raum. Beworben wurde diese Umfrage im Internet (&#252;ber die E-Mailverteiler der einzelnen Bildungsst&#228;tten, in Internetforen wie zum Beispiel <Hyperlink href="http:&#47;&#47;www.Foren4vet.de">http:&#47;&#47;www.Foren4vet.de</Hyperlink>, &#252;ber Twitter und soziale Netzwerke) und in klassischen Printmedien (Deutsches Tier&#228;rzteblatt, TiHo-Anzeiger, Vetimpulse). Im Rahmen der Befragung wurden alle Teilnehmenden &#252;ber das Ziel der Befragung aufgekl&#228;rt und stimmten der Auswertung und Publikation der Daten im Rahmen der Forschungsvorhaben der Stiftung Tier&#228;rztliche Hochschule Hannover zu.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die statistische Auswertung erfolgte direkt im Fragebogenportal surveymonkey und nach einem Download der Daten im Statistikprogramm IBM SPSS 20.0.0. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Results">
      <MainHeadline>Results</MainHeadline><Pgraph>1780 participants responded to the questionnaire, of these 1159 were students and 621 veterinarians. At the University of Veterinary Medicine Foundation, the response rate was approximately 27&#37; of all students at this university. Regarding veterinarians and students from other universities, no exact response rate can be determined because we were not able to contact the entire veterinary profession and it is not known whether the students were contacted via the local mailing lists.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The participants were able to skip certain questions or topics, which means that the number of responses per question may vary from the total number of participants. Of the participants, 83.4&#37; were female and 16.6&#37; male.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Internet speed and PC hardware</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The majority access the internet via high-speed connections such as DSL (58.1&#37;), university connections (18.1&#37;), cable (5&#37;) and WiFi hotspots (22.5&#37;). 32.1&#37; access the web via mobile devices (WiFi hotspots and UMTS&#47;3G).</Pgraph><Pgraph>Of the respondents, 97.7&#37; are able to play audio files and 97.8&#37; can play video files.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Regarding additional equipment, 88.7&#37; stated they had computer speakers or used built-in speakers, 35.2&#37; use a headset and 36.9&#37; a webcam.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Internet use</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Of the respondents, 93.3&#37; use the internet at least once a day and 78.4&#37; use the internet several times a day. Only 0.5&#37; of respondents said they used the internet once a week or less often. There were no significant differences between veterinarians and students, nor between the different age groups.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The main reasons for internet use (see Table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>), both amongst the veterinary profession and the students, was &#8220;Communication&#8221; (in total: 94.6&#37;, 90.8&#37; of vets, 96.6&#37; students) and &#8220;News and information&#8221; (77.9&#37;&#47;78.3&#37;&#47;77.6&#37;). Otherwise students used the internet mainly for &#8220;Research for the university&#8221; (94.8&#37;) and &#8220;Learning&#8221; (85.8&#37;), while veterinarians primarily indicated &#8220;Professional&#8221; uses  (88.1&#37;) .</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Social networks</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Social networks (see Figure 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="figure"/>) like Facebook and StudiVZ&#47;MeinVZ were used by 84.5&#37; of all respondents, with significant differences between veterinary professionals (69.0&#37;) and students (91.9&#37;). Regular use (at least once per week) was reported by 64.8&#37; (54.1&#37; veterinarians, 82.0&#37; students), 21.5&#37; use social networks several times a day (11.8&#37; veterinarians, 26.6&#37; students). Of the 15.5&#37; of respondents who reported no use of social networks, 1.3&#37; (2.8&#37; veterinarians, 0.5&#37; students) stated they were not aware of social networks.</Pgraph><Pgraph>With 70.2&#37; (42.9&#37; veterinarians, 84.7&#37; students) StudiVZ&#47;MeinVZ is the most widely used social network, followed by Facebook with 36.8&#37; (29.7&#37; veterinarians, 40.5&#37; students). Other social networks are less used.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Internet forums</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Internet forums (see Figure 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="figure"/>) were used passively regularly by nearly half of all respondents (43.5&#37;). Passive use refers to the plain consumption, in this case reading. A good third of them (16.6&#37; of all respondents) also regularly post on internet forums, i.e. use forums actively. There were no significant differences between students and veterinarians. Use the most widely used internet forum among the respondents who use forums was <Hyperlink href="http:&#47;&#47;www.foren4vet.de">http:&#47;&#47;www.foren4vet.de</Hyperlink> (60.4&#37;). Other technical forums were used by 25.2&#37;. Non-specialist forums (private use) are used by 27.1&#37; and 12.4&#37; use pet owner forums.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Blogs</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Regular active (at least once per week) blog use was significantly lower with (3.4&#37;). Active blogging takes place almost exclusively in the private sphere (6.2&#37;). Only 3.2&#37; of respondents stated that they wrote veterinary blogs (1.6&#37;), professional blogs (1.0&#37;) or science blogs (0.6&#37;). Blog use tended to be passive: private blogs (24.3&#37;), veterinary blogs (13.7&#37;), professional blogs (4.1&#37;) and science blogs (7.6&#37;). 8.6&#37; of the respondents responded they were not familiar with blogs, 47.5&#37; had never read a blog and 28.2&#37; did so less often than once a week. Here too, no significant differences between students and veterinarians were found.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Wikis</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The difference was even more evident in the active and passive use of wikis such as Wikipedia (see Figure 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="figure"/> and 4 <ImgLink imgNo="4" imgType="figure"/>). 52.5&#37; indicated they regularly used wikis for research. In contrast, 1&#37; said they regularly wrote or corrected contributions. No significant differences between veterinarians and students were found.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The most widely used wiki was Wikipedia (95.6&#37;). The most widely used veterinary wikis were vetipedia (11.9&#37;) and wikivet (8.2&#37;). 2&#37; of all respondents used other non-veterinary wikis apart from Wikipedia.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Instant messaging</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Of all respondents, 45&#37; (24.5&#37; veterinarians, 55.9&#37; students) used instant messaging (IM) (see Figure 5 <ImgLink imgNo="5" imgType="figure"/>) regularly (once per week or more often). In contrast, 26.8&#37; (43.0&#37; veterinarians, 18.3&#37; students) never used IM and 11.5&#37; (17.1&#37; veterinarians, 8.3&#37; students) did not know what IM was. Particularly noticeable was that amongst those using IM several times a day, the veterinary profession was less well represented (6&#37;) than students (20.2&#37;).</Pgraph><Pgraph>With 45.6&#37; (36.8&#37; veterinarians, 50.2&#37; students),  Skype was the most widely used messenger, followed by ICQ with 33.9&#37; (14.8&#37; veterinarians, 43.8&#37; students) and Windows Live Messenger with 13.6&#37; (7.8&#37; veterinarians, 16.7&#37; students). The chat tool of social networking sites that had a similar function were also queried. 12&#37; (8.3&#37; veterinarians, 13.9&#37; students) of respondents reported using them. 32.9&#37; (50.7&#37; veterinarians, 23.7&#37; students) of all respondents used no form of instant messaging.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Podcasts and video podcasts</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Hardly any podcasts and video podcasts (see Table 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="table"/>) are created actively (podcasts by 1.7&#37; and video podcasts by 2.1&#37; of all respondents). Here veterinarians are more active than students (3.7&#37; veterinarians, 1.2&#37; students).</Pgraph><Pgraph>Passive use is higher (15.5&#37; audio podcasts, 20.2&#37; video podcasts) and is approximately the same in both groups. Subject-specific (20.4&#37;), news (18.3&#37;) and entertainment podcasts (30.3&#37;) were frequented.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The ratio for video podcasts is similar: subject-specific (30.0&#37;), news (22.8&#37;) and entertainment podcasts (40.4&#37;). Regarding the use of podcasts and video podcasts, there are no significant differences between veterinarians and students.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Mobile phone use</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Mobile phones are primarily used for making phone calls both by veterinarians and students alike (97.1&#37;: 97.4&#37; veterinarians, 96.9&#37; students) and text messaging (91.8&#37;: 85.2&#37; veterinarians, 95.4&#37; students). 43.3&#37; (34.4&#37; among veterinarians - Students 48.1&#37;) used their mobile phones for taking pictures, 21&#37; (14.5&#37; veterinarians, 24.4&#37; students) for listening to music while using the internet (6.7&#37;: 7.7&#37; veterinarians, 6.1&#37; students) and writing and receiving emails (5&#37;: 7.7&#37; veterinarians, 3.5&#37; students) was a less commonly used feature.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Ergebnisse">
      <MainHeadline>Ergebnisse</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Beantwortet haben den Fragebogen 1780 Teilnehmende. An der Umfrage haben 1159 Studierende und 621 Tier&#228;rztinnen und Tier&#228;rzte teilgenommen. Bei den Studierenden der Stiftung Tier&#228;rztliche Hochschule betrug die R&#252;cklaufquote ca. 27&#37; aller Studierenden dieser Hochschule. F&#252;r die Tier&#228;rztinnen und Tier&#228;rzte und die Studierenden der anderen Hochschulen kann keine genaue R&#252;cklaufquote angegeben werden, da nicht die gesamte Tier&#228;rzteschaft erreicht werden konnte bzw. nicht bekannt ist, ob die Studierenden &#252;ber die dortigen E-Mailverteiler kontaktiert wurden.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Teilnehmenden konnten bestimmte Fragen oder Themenkomplexe auslassen, was dazu f&#252;hrt, dass die Anzahl der Antworten je Frage von der Gesamtteilnehmerzahl abweichen kann. Die Geschlechterverteilung lag bei 83,4&#37; weiblichen gegen&#252;ber 16,6&#37; m&#228;nnlichen Teilnehmern. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Internetgeschwindigkeit und Hardwareausstattung des PCs</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Haupts&#228;chlich wird das Internet &#252;ber Hochgeschwindigkeitszug&#228;nge benutzt wie DSL (58,1&#37;), Universit&#228;tsleitung (18,1&#37;), Kabelleitungen (5&#37;) und WLAN-Hotspots (22,5&#37;). Mobil wird das Internet von 32,1&#37; genutzt (WLAN-Hotspot und UMTS&#47;3g.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Audiodateien k&#246;nnen 97,7&#37; und Videodateien k&#246;nnen 97,8&#37; der Befragten abspielen. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Als Zusatzausstattung gaben 88,7&#37; an, Computerboxen oder integrierte Lautsprecher zu benutzen, 35,2&#37; nutzen ein Headset und 36,9&#37; nutzen eine Webcam.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Internetnutzung</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Von den Befragten nutzten 93,3&#37; das Internet mindestens einmal t&#228;glich &#8211; 78,4&#37; nutzen das Internet sogar mehrmals t&#228;glich. Nur 0,5&#37; der Befragten gaben an, das Internet einmal pro Woche oder seltener zu benutzen. Hier konnten keine signifikanten Unterschiede  zwischen Tier&#228;rzteschaft und Studierenden, noch zwischen den einzelnen Altersgruppen festgestellt werden. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Als Hauptgr&#252;nde wurden f&#252;r die Internetnutzung (siehe Tabelle 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>)  sowohl in der Tier&#228;rzteschaft als auch bei den Studierenden &#8222;Kommunikation&#8220; (insgesamt: 94,6&#37;, T&#196; 90,8&#37; - Stud. 96,6&#37;) und &#8222;Nachrichten und Informationen&#8220; (77,9&#37; &#47; 78,3&#37; &#47; 77,6&#37;) genannt. Die Studierenden nutzten das Internet ansonsten haupts&#228;chlich  zur &#8222;Recherche f&#252;r die Universit&#228;t&#8220; (94,8&#37;) und zum &#8222;Lernen&#8220; (85,8&#37;) w&#228;hrend die Tier&#228;rztinnen und Tier&#228;rzte es vornehmlich &#8222;beruflich&#8220; (88,1&#37;) zur Anwendung brachten.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Soziale Netzwerke</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Soziale Netzwerke (siehe Abbildung 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="figure"/>) wie Facebook und StudiVZ&#47;MeinVZ wurden von 84,5&#37; aller Befragten genutzt, wobei sich deutliche Unterschiede zwischen Tier&#228;rzteschaft (69,0&#37;) und Studierenden (91,9&#37;) ausmachen lie&#223;en. Diese Netzwerke nutzten 64,8&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 54,1&#37; - Studierende 82,0&#37;) aller Befragten regelm&#228;&#223;ig (mindestens einmal pro Woche), es gaben 21,5&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 11,8&#37; - Studierende 26,6&#37;) an, soziale Netzwerke mehrmals t&#228;glich zu nutzen. Von den 15,5&#37; der Befragten, die angaben, soziale Netzwerke gar nicht zu nutzen, gaben 1,3&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 2,8&#37; - Studierende 0,5&#37;) an, soziale Netzwerke nicht zu kennen. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Mit 70,2&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 42,9&#37; - Studierende 84,7&#37;) ist StudiVZ&#47;MeinVZ das meistgenutzte soziale Netzwerk gefolgt von Facebook mit 36,8&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 29,7&#37; - Studierende 40,5&#37;). Andere soziale Netzwerke werden weniger benutzt. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Internetforen</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Internetforen (siehe Abbildung 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="figure"/>) wurden von knapp der H&#228;lfte aller Befragten regelm&#228;&#223;ig passiv genutzt (43,5&#37;). Unter passiver Nutzung versteht man das reine Konsumieren, hier also das Lesen. Gut ein Drittel davon (insgesamt 16,6&#37; aller Befragten) schreiben auch regelm&#228;&#223;ig Beitr&#228;ge in Internetforen, nutzten Foren also aktiv. Dabei gab es keine signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen Studierenden und Tier&#228;rzteschaft. Das meist genutzte Internetforum unter den Befragten, die Foren nutzen, war <Hyperlink href="http:&#47;&#47;www.foren4vet.de">http:&#47;&#47;www.foren4vet.de</Hyperlink> (60,4&#37;). Andere Fachforen wurden von 25,2&#37; genutzt. Fachfremde Foren (im privaten Bereich) werden von 27,1&#37; genutzt und Tierbesitzerforen von 12,4&#37;.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Blogs</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Bei den Blogs war die aktive regelm&#228;&#223;ige (mindestens einmal pro Woche) Nutzung wesentlich schw&#228;cher (3,4&#37;). Aktives Blogging findet fast ausschlie&#223;lich im privaten Bereich statt (6,2&#37;). Lediglich 3,2&#37; der Befragten gaben an, entweder in Fachblogs (1,6&#37;), Berufsblogs (1,0&#37;) oder in Wissenschaftsblogs (0,6&#37;) zu schreiben. Blogs wurden viel eher passiv genutzt: private Blogs (24,3&#37;), Fachblogs (13,7&#37;), Berufsblogs (4,1&#37;) und Wissenschaftsblogs (7,6&#37;). Nicht bekannt waren Blogs 8,6&#37; der Befragten, 47,5&#37; lasen nie einen Blog und 28,2&#37; lasen seltener als einmal w&#246;chentlich in Blogs. Auch hier lassen sich keine signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen Studentenschaft und Tier&#228;rzteschaft feststellen.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Wikis</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Noch deutlicher trat der Unterschied in der aktiven und passiven Nutzung bei Wikis (siehe Abbildung 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="figure"/> und 4 <ImgLink imgNo="4" imgType="figure"/>) wie zum Beispiel Wikipedia auf. Hier gaben 52,5&#37; an, regelm&#228;&#223;ig Wikis zur Recherche zu nutzen. Dagegen gab 1&#37; an, dort regelm&#228;&#223;ig Beitrage zu verfassen oder zu korrigieren. Hier lie&#223;en sich keine signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen Tier&#228;rzteschaft und Studierenden feststellen. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Das meistgenutzte Wiki war Wikipedia (95,6&#37;). Die meistgenutzten tiermedizinischen Wikis waren vetipedia (11,9&#37;) und wikivet (8,2&#37;). 2&#37; aller Befragten nutzten neben Wikipedia andere fachfremde Wikis.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Instantmessenger</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Regelm&#228;&#223;ig (einmal pro Woche oder mehr) benutzten 45&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 24,5&#37; - Studierende 55,9&#37;) aller Befragten einen Instant Messenger (IM) (siehe Abbildung 5 <ImgLink imgNo="5" imgType="figure"/>). Dagegen benutzten 26,8&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 43,0&#37; - Studierende 18,3&#37;) nie einen IM und 11,5&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 17,1&#37; - Studierende 8,3&#37;) wussten nicht, was ein IM ist. Besonders fiel bei den IMs auf, dass bei der Nutzung mehrmals am Tag die Tier&#228;rzteschaft mit 6&#37; aller Tier&#228;rztinnen &#47;Tier&#228;rzten schw&#228;cher vertreten war, als die Studierenden mit 20,2&#37;.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Mit 45,6&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 36,8&#37; - Studierende 50,2&#37;) war Skype der meistgenutzte Messenger gefolgt von ICQ mit 33,9&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 14,8&#37; - Studierende 43,8&#37;) und dem Windows Live Messenger mit 13,6&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 7,8&#37; - Studierende 16,7&#37;). Eine &#228;hnliche Funktion hatten die Chatfunktionen sozialer Netzwerke, die hier mit abgefragt wurden. Es gaben 12&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 8,3&#37; - Studierende 13,9&#37;) der Befragten an, diese zu nutzen. Keinen Instantmessenger benutzen 32,9&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 50,7&#37; - Studierende 23,7&#37;) aller Befragten.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Podcasts und Videopodcasts</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Podcasts und Videopodcasts (siehe Tabelle 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="table"/>) werden kaum aktiv erstellt (Podcasts von 1,7&#37; und Videopodcasts von 2,1&#37; aller Befragten). Dabei ist die Tier&#228;rzteschaft aktiver als die Studierenden (3,7&#37; Tier&#228;rzteschaft, 1,2&#37; Studierende). </Pgraph><Pgraph>Die passive Nutzung ist h&#246;her (Audiopodcasts 15,5&#37; - Videopodcasts 20,2&#37;) und f&#228;llt bei beiden Gruppen in etwa gleich aus. Dabei werden fachspezifische (20,4&#37;), Nachrichten- (18,3&#37;) und Unterhaltungs-Podcasts (30,3&#37;) frequentiert. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Das Verh&#228;ltnis bei den Videopodcasts  ist &#228;hnlich: Fachspezifische (30,0&#37;), Nachrichten- (22,8&#37;) und Unterhaltungs-Podcasts (40,4&#37;). Tier&#228;rzteschaft und Studierende weisen in der Nutzung von Podcasts und Videopodcasts keine signifikanten Unterschiede auf.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Mobiltelefonnutzung</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Mobiltelefone werden von der Tier&#228;rzteschaft und den Studierenden gleicherma&#223;en vorwiegend zum Telefonieren (97,1&#37;: Tier&#228;rzteschaft 97,4&#37; - Studierende 96,9&#37;) und Shortmessageservices (91,8&#37;: Tier&#228;rzteschaft 85,2&#37; - Studierende 95,4&#37;) benutzt. Zum Fotografieren benutzten 43,3&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 34,4&#37; - Studierende 48,1&#37;) ihr Mobiltelefon, 21&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 14,5&#37; - Studierende 24,4&#37;) zum Musikh&#246;ren w&#228;hrend die Internetnutzung  und das E-Mailschreiben und &#8211;empfangen mit 6,7&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 7,7&#37; - Studierende 6,1&#37;) bzw. 5&#37; (Tier&#228;rzteschaft 7,7&#37; - Studierende 3,5&#37;) in den Hintergrund tritt.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Discussion">
      <MainHeadline>Discussion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Finding a means of carrying out as comprehensive a survey as possible was needed which could reach all relevant target groups in order to be able to assess the equipment, internet speed and usage in the veterinary profession and amongst the students of veterinary medicine. This study chose an online survey because in terms of reliability and validity they compare well with traditional surveys <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="47"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink>. Online questionnaires also have the advantage that the interviewer cannot exert any influence on the respondents and that the respondent remain anonymous, thus possibly eliciting more honest answers <TextLink reference="58"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>.  </Pgraph><Pgraph>The high number of participants in the survey included all occupational groups of veterinary medicine and provides useful results even if university staff and students were over-represented in comparison to the total veterinary profession <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>. The gender distribution of the sample was approximately equivalent to the distribution in the student body and amongst veterinarians <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Multiple participation in the survey is rather unlikely <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink> but would not have led to any bias in the results <TextLink reference="83"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The response rate for veterinarians and students of all universities, except for the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, could not be determined because it is unknown how many veterinarians and students were reached. This is one of the major problems with internet surveys <TextLink reference="91"></TextLink>. Only the number of answered questionnaires can be counted, as click counters are also not good indicators <TextLink reference="51"></TextLink>. In contrast, determining the response rate of students of the School of Veterinary Medicine Foundation was possible since they were contacted via the mailing lists for each semester, so each student received an invitation to the survey. The response rate among students of the School of Veterinary Medicine Hannover was comparable with the response rate of an online survey of students in Michigan in 2001 following the first invitation by email <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink> although the students at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover received only one invitation via the semester mailing list. For written surveys, a response rate of 5 - 30&#37; can be expected <TextLink reference="58"></TextLink>. In general, a survey fatigue trend over the last decades can be observed <TextLink reference="78"></TextLink>.   </Pgraph><SubHeadline>PC hardware and internet use</SubHeadline><Pgraph>The study paid special attention to hardware configuration in terms of audio and video because the School of Veterinary Medicine Hannover has plans to increase the use of podcasts, and videos. We found that almost all respondents were able to quickly download and play this type of media. The computer equipment in the veterinary field was therefore above the national average &#91;<Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;www.destatis.de&#47;DE&#47;PresseService&#47;Presse&#47;Pressemitteilungen&#47;2011&#47;12&#47;PD11&#95;474&#95;63931.html">https:&#47;&#47;www.destatis.de&#47;DE&#47;PresseService&#47;Presse&#47;Pressemitteilungen&#47;2011&#47;12&#47;PD11&#95;474&#95;63931.html</Hyperlink>&#93;. Rapid development in terms of computer equipment and internet access has been reported both in Germany <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="90"></TextLink> and abroad <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="62"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="84"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="59"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>PC and internet are an indispensable tool for the majority of students <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink> and the web has become a part of medical education in many ways <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>. Nevertheless, the main motivations for using the internet identified in this study lie in the private sphere, even if a majority of respondents also use the internet for degree courses or professionally for research and learning. A survey of children and adolescents in Germany showed that their motivations are primarily communication (social networks, email and instant messaging), multimedia (video portals, music and video downloads), news and information (search engines, information pages and wikis) and research for school (working on the web with a computer at home and at school) <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>What points to a net generation in veterinary medicine&#63; </SubHeadline><Pgraph>Instant messaging and social networks are used more and more frequently by students. This differential use of social networks was also described by Sandars and Schroter <TextLink reference="77"></TextLink>. Roblyer et al. <TextLink reference="73"></TextLink> see this as an opportunity for teaching in the future. Nationally, most users of social networks are in the 14-29 age group, followed by those aged 30-49 <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="90"></TextLink>. This corresponds exactly to the age groups of students and university staff. But social networks are currently still used mainly privately <TextLink reference="66"></TextLink>. Another snapshot of social networks in higher education shows that they have not yet been used for teaching purposes but further studies are necessary to determine suitability for professional exchange and teaching <TextLink reference="73"></TextLink>. Initial studies in this field have been initiated in veterinary medicine <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>. But this makes training for students and teachers in Web 2.0 indispensable <TextLink reference="77"></TextLink>, as these studies have shown (see below). In addition, universities should design codes of conduct for staff and students who often are members of social networks <TextLink reference="53"></TextLink>. But there are also concerns about integrating teaching into social networks and networking of teachers and students such as negative remarks (flaming), private photos (bullying), data protection and so on <TextLink reference="60"></TextLink>. It may be wise for some individuals to separate personal and professional accounts <TextLink reference="88"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The differences in the use of instant messaging between the age groups under and over 30 found in this study have also been noticed elsewhere <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="77"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. This suggests that communication can be switched to IM and that appointments with students, for example, could be held online. International meetings, courses and CPD could be prepared, held and followed up via IM or virtual classrooms <TextLink reference="55"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink> Students see instant messaging as a good addition to teaching for the future <TextLink reference="74"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>What points away from a net generation in veterinary medicine&#63;</SubHeadline><Pgraph>As described in detail by Schulmeister <TextLink reference="79"></TextLink>, the concept of a generation is hard to grasp and not clearly defined <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>New studies assume that students do not learn differently than their predecessors <TextLink reference="61"></TextLink>. However, the computer is a central tool for obtaining information <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The use of internet forums, blogs, wikis, podcasts and mobile phones does not differ to such an extent between the two groups studied here to claim more intensive use them by one of the two groups. The utilization rates of Web 2.0 media are high. Passive (consuming) use predominated, as opposed to active (producing) use. Sandars and Schroter <TextLink reference="77"></TextLink> have already called for an increased use of Web 2.0 for medical students, something which should also be expanded and trained in veterinary medicine.</Pgraph><Pgraph>It is striking in the present study that podcasts (audio and video) are consumed primarily for entertainment but also for obtaining subject-specific information and news. Podcasts, blogs and wikis can used effectively to encourage learning and communication between doctors, students and patients <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>. Codes of conduct for the use of Web 2.0 tools are required, so that no unprofessional content is provided in connection with online teaching <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In order to ensure that student-generated content (cf &#8220;user generated content&#8221;) is of sufficient academic rigour, methods must be developed to verify such content <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>. But the use of Web 2.0 must also be encouraged amongst the teaching staff, which will require further research into teaching <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>With rapid growth of smart phones on the mobile phone market &#91;<Hyperlink href="http:&#47;&#47;de.statista.com&#47;statistik&#47;faktenbuch&#47;376&#47;a&#47;technik-hardware-software&#47;telekommunikation&#47;smartphone-markt&#47;">http:&#47;&#47;de.statista.com&#47;statistik&#47;faktenbuch&#47;376&#47;a&#47;technik-hardware-software&#47;telekommunikation&#47;smartphone-markt&#47;</Hyperlink>&#93;, studying their potential uses in veterinary medicine seems appropriate. The terms &#8220;U-Learning&#8221; and &#8220;U-campus&#8221; have been mentioned in the literature recently to describe an ubiquitous learning style using smart phones, PDAs and Tablet PCs <TextLink reference="82"></TextLink>.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Diskussion">
      <MainHeadline>Diskussion</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Um die Ausstattung, die Internetgeschwindigkeit und das Internetnutzungsverhalten in der Tier&#228;rzteschaft und unter den Studierenden der Tiermedizin beurteilen zu k&#246;nnen, war die Entwicklung einer m&#246;glichst umfassenden Befragung notwendig, die m&#246;glichst alle relevanten Zielgruppen erreichen konnte. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde eine Online-Befragung gew&#228;hlt, da diese hinsichtlich ihrer Reliabilit&#228;t und Validit&#228;t als vergleichbar mit traditionellen Befragungen angesehen wird <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="47"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink>. Au&#223;erdem bieten Onlinefrageb&#246;gen den Vorteil, dass der Interviewer keinen Einfluss auf die Befragten aus&#252;ben kann, der Befragte anonym bleibe und somit gegebenenfalls ehrlicher antwortet <TextLink reference="58"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>.  </Pgraph><Pgraph>Die hohe Zahl der Teilnehmer an der Befragung umfasste alle Berufsgruppen der Tiermedizin und liefert verwertbare Ergebnisse, auch wenn die Berufsgruppe Hochschulmitarbeiter und Doktoranden im Vergleich zur Gesamttier&#228;rzteschaft &#252;berrepr&#228;sentiert war <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>. Die Geschlechterverteilung der Stichprobe entsprach in etwa der Verteilung in der Studierendenschaft und Tier&#228;rzteschaft <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Mehrfachteilnahmen an der Befragung gelten eher als unwahrscheinlich <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink> h&#228;tten aber auch  zu keiner Verzerrung der Ergebnisse gef&#252;hrt <TextLink reference="83"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die R&#252;cklaufquote bei der Tier&#228;rzteschaft und den Studierenden aller Hochschulen mit Ausnahme der Stiftung Tier&#228;rztliche Hochschule Hannover konnte nicht ermittelt werden, da unbekannt ist, wie viele Tier&#228;rztinnen, Tier&#228;rzte und Studierende erreicht wurden. Dies ist eines der Hauptprobleme bei Internetumfragen <TextLink reference="91"></TextLink>. Nur die Anzahl der beantworteten Frageb&#246;gen kann gez&#228;hlt werden, da auch Klickz&#228;hler keine guten Indikatoren sind <TextLink reference="51"></TextLink>. Im Gegensatz dazu war die Bestimmung der R&#252;cklaufquote bei den Studierenden der Stiftung Tier&#228;rztliche Hochschule m&#246;glich, da diese &#252;ber Semesteremailverteiler kontaktiert wurden und damit jeder Studierende die Einladung zu der Umfrage erhalten hat. Die R&#252;cklaufquote bei den Studierenden der Stiftung Tier&#228;rztliche Hochschule Hannover war vergleichbar mit der R&#252;cklaufquote einer Onlineumfrage von Studierenden in Michigan 2001 nach der ersten Einladung per E-Mail &#91;20&#93; &#8211; die Studierenden an der Stiftung Tier&#228;rztliche Hochschule Hannover erhielten lediglich eine einzige Einladung &#252;ber die Semesteremailverteiler. Bei schriftlichen Umfragen ist eine R&#252;cklaufquote von 5 &#8211; 30&#37; zu erwarten <TextLink reference="58"></TextLink>. Allgemein ist ein Trend von Umfragem&#252;digkeit &#252;ber die letzten Dekaden zu beobachten <TextLink reference="78"></TextLink>.   </Pgraph><SubHeadline>PC-Ausstattung und Internetnutzung</SubHeadline><Pgraph>In der Studie wurde besonderes Augenmerk auf die Hardwareausstattung hinsichtlich Audio und Video gelegt, da an der Stiftung Tier&#228;rztliche Hochschule Hannover vermehrt Podcasts und Videos eingesetzt werden sollen. Es lie&#223; sich feststellen, dass nahezu alle Befragten in der Lage waren, sich diese Medien schnell herunterzuladen und abzuspielen. Die Computerausstattung der Tiermediziner lag damit weit &#252;ber dem Bundesdurchschnitt <Hyperlink href="https:&#47;&#47;www.destatis.de&#47;DE&#47;PresseService&#47;Presse&#47;Pressemitteilungen&#47;2011&#47;12&#47;PD11&#95;474&#95;63931.html">https:&#47;&#47;www.destatis.de&#47;DE&#47;PresseService&#47;Presse&#47;Pressemitteilungen&#47;2011&#47;12&#47;PD11&#95;474&#95;63931.html</Hyperlink>&#93;. Eine rasante Entwicklung hinsichtlich der PC-Ausstattung und des Internetzugangs ist sowohl in Deutschland <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="90"></TextLink> als auch international nachweisbar <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="62"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="84"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="59"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>PC und Internet sind f&#252;r den &#252;berwiegenden Teil der Studierenden ein unverzichtbares Arbeitsmittel <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink> und das Internet ist in weiten Teilen zu einem Bestandteil der medizinischen Ausbildung geworden <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>. Dennoch lagen die in dieser Studie festgestellten Hauptmotivationen, das Internet zu nutzen im privaten Bereich, auch wenn ein Gro&#223;teil der Befragten das Internet zus&#228;tzlich f&#252;r die Universit&#228;t oder den Beruf zum Recherchieren und zum Lernen anwendete. Eine Befragung unter Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland ergab, dass deren Motivation ebenso haupts&#228;chlich die Kommunikation (soziale Netzwerke, E-Mails und Instant Messenger), Multimedia (Videoportale, Musik und Videodownload), Informationen und Nachrichten (Suchmaschinen, Informationsseiten und Wikis) und Recherche f&#252;r die Schule (Arbeiten daheim und in der Schule mit dem Computer im Internet) darstellte <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><SubHeadline>Was spricht f&#252;r eine net-Generation in der Tiermedizin&#63; </SubHeadline><Pgraph>Instant Messenger und soziale Netzwerke werden mehr und h&#228;ufiger von Studierenden genutzt. Diese unterschiedliche Nutzung sozialer Netzwerke wurde auch von Sandars und Schroter <TextLink reference="77"></TextLink> beschrieben. Roblyer et al. <TextLink reference="73"></TextLink> sehen darin Chancen f&#252;r die zuk&#252;nftige Lehre. Im Bundesschnitt  sind die meisten Nutzer von sozialen Netzwerken in der Altersgruppe 14 &#8211; 29 Jahre  gefolgt von der Altersgruppe 30 &#8211; 49 Jahre <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="90"></TextLink>. Dies entspricht genau den Altersgruppen der Studierenden und der Hochschulmitarbeiter. Der Einsatz sozialer Netzwerke findet zur Zeit aber noch haupts&#228;chlich privat statt <TextLink reference="67"></TextLink>. Eine weitere Momentaufnahme sozialer Netzwerke in der Hochschulbildung zeigt, dass diese noch nicht in der Lehre eingesetzt  wurden, weitere Untersuchungen aber notwendig seien, um die Eignung f&#252;r professionellen und lehrenden Austausch festzustellen <TextLink reference="73"></TextLink>. Erste Untersuchungen hierzu wurden in der Tiermedizin bereits gestartet <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>. Ein Training f&#252;r Studierende und Lehrende in Web 2.0 Nutzung ist allerdings unverzichtbar <TextLink reference="77"></TextLink>, wie auch die weiteren Ergebnisse dieser Untersuchung gezeigt haben (s.u.). Au&#223;erdem sollten Universit&#228;ten, deren Mitarbeiter und Studenten oftmals Mitglieder in sozialen Netzwerken sind und die oftmals selbst Internetpr&#228;senzen in sozialen Netzwerken haben, Verhaltensregeln f&#252;r das Auftreten in sozialen Netzwerken erstellen <TextLink reference="53"></TextLink>. Es bestehen aber auch Bedenken, Lehre in sozialen Netzwerken zu integrieren bzw. bei der Vernetzung von Lehrenden und Studenten: Negative &#196;u&#223;erungen (Flaming), private Fotos (Mobbing), Datenschutz, etc. <TextLink reference="60"></TextLink>. Eventuell ist es f&#252;r einige Person sinnvoll, private und professionelle Accounts getrennt zu erstellen <TextLink reference="88"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die auch hier aufgefallene unterschiedliche Nutzung von Instant-Messengern in den Altersgruppen unter bzw. &#252;ber 30 Jahren wurde in Untersuchungen in anderen Bereichen gezeigt <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="77"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. Daraus ergibt sich, dass man die Kommunikation auf IMs verlagern kann und zum Beispiel Studentensprechstunden online abhalten k&#246;nnte. Auch internationale Meetings, Lehrveranstaltungen und Fortbildungen k&#246;nnen via IMs oder virtuellen Klassenr&#228;umen <TextLink reference="55"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink> vorbereitet werden, stattfinden oder nachbereitet werden. Studenten sehen in  Instantmessenging zuk&#252;nftig eine gute Erg&#228;nzung in der Lehre <TextLink reference="74"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline>Was spricht gegen eine net-Generation in der Tiermedizin&#63;</SubHeadline><Pgraph>Wie bereits von Schulmeister <TextLink reference="79"></TextLink> deutlich beschrieben, ist der Begriff der Generation nicht einfach zu fassen und nicht eindeutig definiert <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Neue Studien gehen davon aus, dass die Studenten nicht anders lernen als ihre  Vorg&#228;nger <TextLink reference="61"></TextLink>. Allerdings ist der Computer ein zentrales Werkzeug zum Beschaffen von Informationen <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Nutzung der Internetforen, Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts und die Mobiltelefonnutzung unterscheiden sich in den beiden hier untersuchten Gruppen nicht so stark, dass man von eine wesentlich intensiveren Nutzung der einen oder anderen Gruppe sprechen kann. Die Nutzungsraten dieser Web 2.0-Medien sind hoch. Es &#252;berwiegte vor allem die passive (konsumierende) Nutzung im Gegensatz zur aktiven (produzierenden). Wie bereits von Sandars und Schroter <TextLink reference="77"></TextLink> f&#252;r Medizinstudierende gefordert, sollte der Einsatz von Web 2.0-Werkzeugen auch bei Tiermedizinern weiter ausgebaut und trainiert werden. </Pgraph><Pgraph>In der vorliegenden Studie f&#228;llt auf, dass Podcasts (Audio und Video) in erster Linie zur Unterhaltung konsumiert werden, aber auch zur Beschaffung von  fachspezifischen Informationen und Nachrichten.  Podcasts, Blogs und Wikis k&#246;nnen, effektiv eingesetzt, das Lernengagement und die Kommunikation zwischen &#196;rzten, Studenten und Patienten f&#246;rdern <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink>. Verhaltensregeln f&#252;r die Nutzung von web2.0 Tools sind erforderlich, damit kein unprofessioneller Inhalt im Zusammenhang mit der Lehre online gestellt wird <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Damit von Studierenden generierte Inhalte (vgl. &#8222;user generated content&#8220;) dem Anspruch der Lehre gen&#252;gen, muss eine Methode entwickelt werden,  die Inhalte seitens der Lehrenden zu &#252;berpr&#252;fen <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>. Aber auch den Lehrenden muss der Einsatz der web2.0 Tools nahegebracht werden, was weitere Ausbildungsforschung erfordert <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Bei rasantem Anstieg der Smartphones auf dem Mobiltelefonmarkt <Hyperlink href="http:&#47;&#47;de.statista.com&#47;statistik&#47;faktenbuch&#47;376&#47;a&#47;technik-hardware-software&#47;telekommunikation&#47;smartphone-markt&#47;">http:&#47;&#47;de.statista.com&#47;statistik&#47;faktenbuch&#47;376&#47;a&#47;technik-hardware-software&#47;telekommunikation&#47;smartphone-markt&#47;</Hyperlink>&#93;, legt die Erforschung ihrer Nutzung in der Tiermedizin nahe. &#8222;U-Learning&#8220; und &#8222;U-Campus&#8220; werden in der j&#252;ngsten Literatur genannt f&#252;r das ubiquit&#228;re Lernen mit Smartphones, PDAs und Tablet PCs <TextLink reference="82"></TextLink>.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Conclusions">
      <MainHeadline>Conclusions</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Based on the collected data, it is not possible to prove the existence of a uniform &#8220;net generation&#8221; in veterinary medicine. For almost all respondents use of the web is natural irrespective of age differences. There are differences in the usage of social networks and instant messaging. Other Web 2.0 tools were used equally, with considerably more data being consumed than produced, more commonly in private than in professionally.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Students of veterinary medicine and veterinarians are comparable with other professional groups in terms of their usage.</Pgraph><Pgraph>It is therefore important to train both teachers and students (i.e. students, teaching staff and veterinarians) in the used of media and to illustrate both risks and opportunities. In addition, web policies regarding professional conduct on the web in general and especially on social networks should be created and further research carried out on this topic.</Pgraph><Pgraph>We see information and media competence as a key skill which enables evidence-based lifelong learning and thus as core competency for students and veterinarians.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Schlussfolgerung">
      <MainHeadline>Schlussfolgerung</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Eine einheitliche &#8222;net-Generation&#8220; l&#228;sst sich anhand der erfassten Daten in der Tiermedizin nicht belegen. Bei fast allen Befragten ist die Benutzung des Internets ohne Altersunterschiede selbstverst&#228;ndlich. Es gibt Unterschiede im Nutzungsverhalten sozialer Netzwerke und von Instant Messengern. Die &#252;brigen Web 2.0 Tools wurden gleicherma&#223;en genutzt, wobei deutlich zu sehen war, dass mehr konsumiert als produziert wurde und dies mehr im privaten als im beruflichen Bereich. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Studierenden der Tiermedizin und die Tier&#228;rzteschaft sind in ihrem Nutzungsverhalten mit anderen Berufsgruppen vergleichbar. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Daher ist es wichtig, sowohl die Lehrenden als auch die Lernenden, also Studierende, Dozierende und die Tier&#228;rzteschaft,  im Umgang mit Medien zu schulen und dabei sowohl Risiken als auch Chancen zu verdeutlichen. Zus&#228;tzlich sollten Regelwerke (Internet-Policies) zum professionellen Verhalten im Internet im Allgemeinen und sozialen Netzwerken im Speziellen erstellt werden und weitere Forschung zu diesem Thema betrieben werden.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Informations- und Medienkompetenz wird von uns als wichtige Kompetenz, die evidenzbasiertes lebenslanges Lernen erst erm&#246;glicht, und damit als eine Kernkompetenz f&#252;r Studierende und Tiermediziner angesehen.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Acknowledgements">
      <MainHeadline>Acknowledgements</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Special thanks go to Volkswagenstiftung und Gesellschaft der Freunde der TiHo for supporting this study.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Danksagung">
      <MainHeadline>Danksagung</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Besonderer Dank f&#252;r die Unterst&#252;tzung der Studie geb&#252;hrt der Volkswagenstiftung und der Gesellschaft der Freunde der TiHo.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Competing Interests">
      <MainHeadline>Competing Interests</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Interessenkonflikt">
      <MainHeadline>Interessenkonflikt</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Die Autoren erkl&#228;ren, dass sie keine Interessenkonflikte im Zusammenhang mit diesem Artikel haben. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <References linked="yes">
      <Reference refNo="1">
        <RefAuthor>Arnold P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Die &#34;Netzgeneration&#34; - Empirische Untersuchungen zur Mediennutzung bei Jugendlichen</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Lehrbuch f&#252;r Lernen und Lehren mit Technologien</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Arnold P. Die &#34;Netzgeneration&#34; - Empirische Untersuchungen zur Mediennutzung bei Jugendlichen. In: Sch&#246;n S, Ebner M (Hrsg). Lehrbuch f&#252;r Lernen und Lehren mit Technologien. Graz: TU Graz, L3T; 2011.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="2">
        <RefAuthor>Babalobi OO</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Towards a development and use of internet web and information communication technologies for veterinary medicine education in Nigeria</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>5th Conference of animal health information specialists</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Babalobi OO. Towards a development and use of internet web and information communication technologies for veterinary medicine education in Nigeria. 5th Conference of animal health information specialists. Onderstepoort: University of Pretoria; 2007.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="3">
        <RefAuthor>Baillie S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kinnison T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Forrest N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dale VH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ehlers JP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Koch M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>M&#225;ndoki M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ciobotaru E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>de Groot E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Boerboom TB</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>van Beukelen P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Developing an Online Professional Network for Veterinary Education: The NOVICE Project</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Vet Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>395-403</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Baillie S, Kinnison T, Forrest N, Dale VH, Ehlers JP, Koch M, M&#225;ndoki M, Ciobotaru E, de Groot E, Boerboom TB, van Beukelen P. Developing an Online Professional Network for Veterinary Education: The NOVICE Project. J Vet Med Educ. 2011;38(4):395-403. DOI: 10.3138&#47;jvme.38.4.395</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.3138&#47;jvme.38.4.395</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="4">
        <RefAuthor>Bartolom&#233; A</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Web 2.0 and New Learning Paradigms</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>eLearn Paper</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>4</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bartolom&#233; A. Web 2.0 and New Learning Paradigms. eLearn Paper. 2008;8:4. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: http:&#47;&#47;www.elearningeuropa.info&#47;files&#47;media&#47;media15529.pdf</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;www.elearningeuropa.info&#47;files&#47;media&#47;media15529.pdf</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="5">
        <RefAuthor>Batinic B</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Fragebogenuntersuchungen im Internet</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Batinic B. Fragebogenuntersuchungen im Internet. Aachen: Shaker-Verlag; 2001.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="6">
        <RefAuthor>Baur N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Florian MJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Stichprobenprobleme bei Online-Umfragen</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Sozialforschung im Internet. Methodologie und Praxis der Online-Befragung</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>109-128</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Baur N, Florian MJ. Stichprobenprobleme bei Online-Umfragen. In: Jakob N, Schoen H, Zerback T (Hrsg). Sozialforschung im Internet. Methodologie und Praxis der Onlien-Befragung. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag; 2008. S.109-128.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="7">
        <RefAuthor>Behrens P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rathgeb T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Jugend, Information, (Multi-) Media; Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-J&#228;hriger in Deutschland</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Behrens P, Rathgeb T. Jugend, Information, (Multi-) Media; Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-J&#228;hriger in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Medienp&#228;dagogischer Forschungsverbund S&#252;dwest; 2011. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;avialable from: http:&#47;&#47;www.mpfs.de&#47;fileadmin&#47;JIM-pdf11&#47;JIM2011.pdf</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;www.mpfs.de&#47;fileadmin&#47;JIM-pdf11&#47;JIM2011.pdf</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="8">
        <RefAuthor>Behrens P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rathgeb T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Kinder &#43; Medien, Computer &#43; Internet; Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 6- bis 13-J&#228;hriger in Deutschland</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Behrens P, Rathgeb T. Kinder &#43; Medien, Computer &#43; Internet; Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 6- bis 13-J&#228;hriger in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Medienp&#228;dagogischer Forschungsverbund S&#252;dwest; 2010. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: http:&#47;&#47;www.mpfs.de&#47;fileadmin&#47;KIM-pdf10&#47;KIM2010.pdf</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;www.mpfs.de&#47;fileadmin&#47;KIM-pdf10&#47;KIM2010.pdf</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="9">
        <RefAuthor>Birnbaum MH</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Human Research and Data Collection via the Internet</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Ann Rev Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>803-832</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Birnbaum MH. Human Research and Data Collection via the Internet. Ann Rev Psychol. 2004;55(1):803-832. DOI: 10.1146&#47;annurev.psych.55.090902.141601</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1146&#47;annurev.psych.55.090902.141601</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="10">
        <RefAuthor>Blumberg P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Why Self-Directed Learning Is Not Learned and Practiced in Veterinary Education</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2005</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Vet Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>290-295</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Blumberg P. Why Self-Directed Learning Is Not Learned and Practiced in Veterinary Education. J Vet Med Educ. 2005;32(3):290-295.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="11">
        <RefAuthor>B&#246;rchers M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tipold A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Pfarrer C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fischer MR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ehlers JP</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Akzeptanz von fallbasiertem, interaktivem eLearning in der Tiermedizin am Beispiel des CASUS-Systems</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Tier&#228;rztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>379-388</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>B&#246;rchers M, Tipold A, Pfarrer C, Fischer MR, Ehlers JP. Akzeptanz von fallbasiertem, interaktivem eLearning in der Tiermedizin am Beispiel des CASUS-Systems. Tier&#228;rztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere. 2010;38(6):379-388.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="12">
        <RefAuthor>Borges NJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Manuel RS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Elam CL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jones BJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Comparing Millennial and Generation X Medical Students at One Medical School</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Acad Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>571-576</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Borges NJ, Manuel RS, Elam CL, Jones BJ. Comparing Millennial and Generation X Medical Students at One Medical School. Acad Med. 2006;81(6):571-576. DOI: 10.1097&#47;01.ACM.0000225222.38078.47</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;01.ACM.0000225222.38078.47</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="13">
        <RefAuthor>Boulos M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Maramba I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wheeler S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMC Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>41</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Boulos M, Maramba I, Wheeler S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6(1):41. DOI: 10.1186&#47;1472-6920-6-41</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1186&#47;1472-6920-6-41</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="14">
        <RefAuthor>Brigley S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Continuing education in the medical professions: professional development or bureaucratic convenience&#63;</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1997</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Teach Develop</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>175-190</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Brigley S. Continuing education in the medical professions: professional development or bureaucratic convenience&#63; Teach Develop. 1997;1(2):175-190. DOI: 10.1080&#47;13664539700200022</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;13664539700200022</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="15">
        <RefAuthor>Bundestier&#228;rztekammer</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Statistik 2009: Tier&#228;rzteschaft in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Dtsch Tier&#228;rztebl</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>4</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bundestier&#228;rztekammer. Statistik 2009: Tier&#228;rzteschaft in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Dtsch Tier&#228;rztebl. 2010:4.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="16">
        <RefAuthor>Chretien KC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Greysen SR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chretien JP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kind T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Online Posting of Unprofessional Content by Medical Students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>JAMA</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1309-1315</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, Kind T. Online Posting of Unprofessional Content by Medical Students. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1309-1315. DOI: 10.1001&#47;jama.2009.1387</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1001&#47;jama.2009.1387</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="17">
        <RefAuthor>Conole G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>de LaatM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dillon T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Darby J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>&#34;Disruptive technologies&#34;, &#34;pedagogical innovation&#34;: What&#39;s new&#63; Findings from an in-depth study of students&#39; use and perception of technology</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Comp Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>511-524</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Conole G, de LaatM, Dillon T, Darby J. &#34;Disruptive technologies&#34;, &#34;pedagogical innovation&#34;: What&#39;s new&#63; Findings from an in-depth study of students&#39; use and perception of technology. Comp Educ. 2008;50(2):511-524. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: http:&#47;&#47;www.e4innovation.com&#47;Papers&#47;conole&#95;lxp&#95;cal&#95;paper&#37;20v2.pdf</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;www.e4innovation.com&#47;Papers&#47;conole&#95;lxp&#95;cal&#95;paper&#37;20v2.pdf</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="18">
        <RefAuthor>Corsten M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Generation und institutioneller Wandel</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2003</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>SFB 580 Mitteil</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>83-89</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Corsten M. Generation und institutioneller Wandel. SFB 580 Mitteil. 2003;9:83-89.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="19">
        <RefAuthor>Costa SD</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Medizinische Aus-, Weiter- und Fortbildung: Versuchte Definitionen - Medical Training and Residency Programs: Current Caveats</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Geburtshilf Frauenheilkund</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1065-1070</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Costa SD. Medizinische Aus-, Weiter- und Fortbildung: Versuchte Definitionen - Medical Training and Residency Programs: Current Caveats. Geburtshilf Frauenheilkund. 2009;69(12):1065-1070. DOI: 10.1055&#47;s-0029-1240646</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1055&#47;s-0029-1240646</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="20">
        <RefAuthor>Couper MP</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Web Survey Design and Administration</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Public Opin Q</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>230-253</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Couper MP. Web Survey Design and Administration. Public Opin Q. 2001;65(2):230-253. DOI: 10.1086&#47;322199</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1086&#47;322199</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="21">
        <RefAuthor>Curran VR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fleet L</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A review of evaluation outcomes of web-based continuing medical education</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2005</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>561-567</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Curran VR, Fleet L. A review of evaluation outcomes of web-based continuing medical education. Med Educ. 2005;39(6):561-567. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2929.2005.02173.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2929.2005.02173.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="22">
        <RefAuthor>Dale VH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kinnison T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Short N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>May SA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Baillie S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Web 2.0 and the veterinary profession: current trends and future implications for lifelong learning</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Vet Rec</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>467</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dale VH, Kinnison T, Short N, May SA, Baillie S. Web 2.0 and the veterinary profession: current trends and future implications for lifelong learning. Vet Rec. 2011;169(18):467. DOI: 10.1136&#47;vr.d4897</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1136&#47;vr.d4897</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="23">
        <RefAuthor>Dale VH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sullivan M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>May SA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Adult Learning in Veterinary Education: Theory to Practice</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Vet Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>581-588</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dale VH, Sullivan M, May SA. Adult Learning in Veterinary Education: Theory to Practice. J Vet Med Educ. 2008;35(4):581-588. DOI: 10.3138&#47;jvme.35.4.581</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.3138&#47;jvme.35.4.581</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="24">
        <RefAuthor>Davis D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>O&#39;Brien MA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Freemantle N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wolf FM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mazmanian P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Taylor-Vaisey A</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Impact of Formal Continuing Medical Education</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1999</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>JAMA</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>867-874</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Davis D, O&#39;Brien MA, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of Formal Continuing Medical Education. JAMA. 1999;282(9):867-874. DOI: 10.1001&#47;jama.282.9.867</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1001&#47;jama.282.9.867</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="25">
        <RefAuthor>De Witt C</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Medienbildung f&#252;r die Netz-Generation</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2000</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Medien P&#228;dag</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1-12</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>De Witt C. Medienbildung f&#252;r die Netz-Generation. Medien P&#228;dag. 2000;1(1):1-12.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="26">
        <RefAuthor>Doherty I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cooper P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Educating educators in the purposeful use of Web 2.0 tools for teaching and learning</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>208-217</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Doherty I, Cooper P. Educating educators in the purposeful use of Web 2.0 tools for teaching and learning. Auckland: University of Auckland; 2009. S.208-217. Zug&#228;nglich unter: http:&#47;&#47;www.ascilite.org.au&#47;conferences&#47;auckland09&#47;procs&#47;doherty.pdf</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;www.ascilite.org.au&#47;conferences&#47;auckland09&#47;procs&#47;doherty.pdf</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="27">
        <RefAuthor>Ebersbach A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Glaser M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Heigl R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Warta A</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Wiki - Kooperation im Web</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ebersbach A, Glaser M, Heigl R, Warta A. Wiki - Kooperation im Web. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2007.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="28">
        <RefAuthor>Ebner M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Internetforen: verwenden - einrichten &#8211; betreiben</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ebner M. Internetforen: verwenden - einrichten &#8211; betreiben. Norderstedt: Books on Demand; 2008.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="29">
        <RefAuthor>Ehlers JP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ehlers S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Behr M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>K&#228;hn W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bollwein H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Leidl W</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>OnLineLectures - eLearning als Erg&#228;nzung der tier&#228;rztlichen Fortbildung</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>GMS Z Med Ausbild</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>Doc101</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ehlers JP, Ehlers S, Behr M, K&#228;hn W, Bollwein H, Leidl W. OnLineLectures - eLearning als Erg&#228;nzung der tier&#228;rztlichen Fortbildung. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2008;25(4):Doc101. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: http:&#47;&#47;www.egms.de&#47;static&#47;de&#47;journals&#47;zma&#47;2008-25&#47;zma000586.shtml</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;www.egms.de&#47;static&#47;de&#47;journals&#47;zma&#47;2008-25&#47;zma000586.shtml</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="30">
        <RefAuthor>Ehlers JP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wittenberg B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fehrlage K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Neumann S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>VETlife - continuing veterinary education arranged by eLearning</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>ECEL 2007 - 6th European Conference on e-Learning; 4-5 October 2007; Copenhagen, Denmark</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>183-187</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ehlers JP, Wittenberg B, Fehrlage K, Neumann S. VETlife - continuing veterinary education arranged by eLearning. ECEL 2007 - 6th European Conference on e-Learning; 4-5 October 2007; Copenhagen, Denmark. Reading: Academic Conferences Ltd; 2007. S.183-187. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: http:&#47;&#47;www.academic-conferences.org&#47;pdfs&#47;ecel07-booklet.pdf</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;www.academic-conferences.org&#47;pdfs&#47;ecel07-booklet.pdf</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="31">
        <RefAuthor>Fick J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Doluschitz R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Vernetzung tiergesundheitsrelevanter Daten zu einem integrierten Tiergesundheitssystem</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Z&#252;chtungskunde</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>11-19</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Fick J, Doluschitz R. Vernetzung tiergesundheitsrelevanter Daten zu einem integrierten Tiergesundheitssystem. Z&#252;chtungskunde. 2007;80(1):11-19.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="32">
        <RefAuthor>Finkenhagen K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Haga &#216;</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>How can Instant Messaging support communication in a Wireless Environment&#63; &#8211; Medical Students use of Personal Digital Assistant for Messaging in the Knowmobile Project</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Finkenhagen K, Haga &#216;. How can Instant Messaging support communication in a Wireless Environment&#63; &#8211; Medical Students use of Personal Digital Assistant for Messaging in the Knowmobile Project. Oslo: University of Oslo, Department of Informatics; 2002.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="33">
        <RefAuthor>Fox RD</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>West RF</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Developing medical student competence in lifelong learning: the contract learning approach</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1983</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>247&#8211;253</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Fox RD, West RF. Developing medical student competence in lifelong learning: the contract learning approach. Med Educ. 1983;17(4):247&#8211;253. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.1983.tb01458.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.1983.tb01458.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="34">
        <RefAuthor>Frankford DM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Patterson MA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Konrad TR</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Transforming Practice Organizations to Foster Lifelong Learning and Commitment to Medical Professionalism</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2000</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Acad Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>708-717</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Frankford DM, Patterson MA, Konrad TR. Transforming Practice Organizations to Foster Lifelong Learning and Commitment to Medical Professionalism. Acad Med. 2000;75(7):708-717. DOI: 10.1097&#47;00001888-200007000-00012</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;00001888-200007000-00012</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="36">
        <RefAuthor>Genn JM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education&#8212;a unifying perspective</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Teach</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>337-344</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Genn JM. Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education&#8212;a unifying perspective. Med Teach. 2001;23(4):337-344. DOI: 10.1080&#47;01421590120063330</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;01421590120063330</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="37">
        <RefAuthor>Gerlach FM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Beyer M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>&#196;rztliche Fortbildung aus der Sicht niedergelassener &#196;rztinnen und &#196;rzte &#8211; repr&#228;sentative Ergebnisse aus Bremen und Sachsen-Anhalt</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1999</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Z Arztl Fortbild Qual Gesundheitswes</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>581&#8211;589</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Gerlach FM, Beyer M. &#196;rztliche Fortbildung aus der Sicht niedergelassener &#196;rztinnen und &#196;rzte &#8211; repr&#228;sentative Ergebnisse aus Bremen und Sachsen-Anhalt. Z Arztl Fortbild Qual Gesundheitswes. 1999;93:581&#8211;589.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="38">
        <RefAuthor>Goldfinger SE</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Continuing Medical Education &#8211; The Case for Contamination</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1982</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>New Engl J Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>540-541</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Goldfinger SE. Continuing Medical Education &#8211; The Case for Contamination. New Engl J Med. 1982;306:540-541. DOI: 10.1056&#47;NEJM198203043060910</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1056&#47;NEJM198203043060910</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="39">
        <RefAuthor>Gray K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Thompson C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sheard J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Clerehan R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hamilton M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Students as Web 2.0 authors: Implications for assessment design and conduct</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Aus J Educ Technol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>105-122</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Gray K, Thompson C, Sheard J, Clerehan R, Hamilton M. Students as Web 2.0 authors: Implications for assessment design and conduct. Aus J Educ Technol. 2010;26(1):105-122. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: http:&#47;&#47;www.ascilite.org.au&#47;ajet&#47;ajet26&#47;gray.pdf</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;www.ascilite.org.au&#47;ajet&#47;ajet26&#47;gray.pdf</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="40">
        <RefAuthor>Griebenow R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lehmacher W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>L&#246;sche P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kr&#228;mer L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Niesen S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lee J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Christ H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>St&#252;tzer H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Stosch C</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Evaluation of continuing medical education (CME) in print media</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2003</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Dtsch Med Wochenschr</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>725-733</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Griebenow R, Lehmacher W, L&#246;sche P, Kr&#228;mer L, Niesen S, Lee J, Christ H, St&#252;tzer H, Stosch C. Evaluation of continuing medical education (CME) in print media. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2003;128(14):725-733. DOI: 10.1055&#47;s-2003-38422</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1055&#47;s-2003-38422</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="41">
        <RefAuthor>Grzybowski S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lirenman D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>White MI</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Identifying educational influentials for formal and informal continuing medical education in the province of British Columbia</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>20002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Contin Educ Health Prof</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>85-90</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Grzybowski S, Lirenman D, White MI. Identifying educational influentials for formal and informal continuing medical education in the province of British Columbia. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 20002;20(2):85-90.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="42">
        <RefAuthor>Guernsey L</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Message to Marketers: RU4 Real&#63;</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Guernsey L. Message to Marketers: RU4 Real&#63; New York: The New York Times; 2001.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="43">
        <RefAuthor>G&#252;nther J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Digital Natives &#38; Digital Immigrants</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>G&#252;nther J. Digital Natives &#38; Digital Immigrants. Innsbruck, Wien, Bozen: Studienverlag; 2007.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="44">
        <RefAuthor>Hanekop H</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>PC- und Internetnutzung im Studium aus der Sicht der Studierenden</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2003</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>PIK</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>125-132</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hanekop H. PC- und Internetnutzung im Studium aus der Sicht der Studierenden. PIK. 2003;26(3):125-132. DOI: 10.1515&#47;PIKO.2003.125</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1515&#47;PIKO.2003.125</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="45">
        <RefAuthor>Harden RM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Trends and the future of postgraduate medical education</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Emer Med J</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>798-802</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Harden RM. Trends and the future of postgraduate medical education. Emer Med J. 2006;23(10):798-802. DOI: 10.1136&#47;emj.2005.033738</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1136&#47;emj.2005.033738</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="46">
        <RefAuthor>Heath KJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jones JG</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Experiences and attitudes of consultant and nontraining grade anaesthetists to continuing medical education (CME)</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1998</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Anaesth</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>461-467</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Heath KJ, Jones JG. Experiences and attitudes of consultant and nontraining grade anaesthetists to continuing medical education (CME). Anaesth. 1998;53(5):461-467. DOI: 10.1046&#47;j.1365-2044.1998.00373.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1046&#47;j.1365-2044.1998.00373.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="47">
        <RefAuthor>Hertel G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Naumann S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Konrad U</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Batinic B</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Person assessment via Internet: comparing Online and paper-and-pencil questionnaires</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Online Social Sciences</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hertel G, Naumann S, Konrad U, Batinic B. Person assessment via Internet: comparing Online and paper-and-pencil questionnaires. In: Batinic B, Reips UD, Bosnjuak M (Hrsg). Online Social Sciences. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe &#38; Huber; 2002.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="48">
        <RefAuthor>Hoblet KH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Maccabe AT</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Heider LE</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Veterinarians in Population Health and Public Practice: Meeting Critical National Needs</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Vet Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>232-239</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hoblet KH, Maccabe AT, Heider LE. Veterinarians in Population Health and Public Practice: Meeting Critical National Needs. J Vet Med Educ. 2002;30(3):232-239.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="49">
        <RefAuthor>Kamel Boulos MN</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wheeler S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Health Inform Libr J</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>2-23</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kamel Boulos MN, Wheeler S. The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Inform Libr J. 2007;24(1):2-23. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1471-1842.2007.00701.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1471-1842.2007.00701.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="50">
        <RefAuthor>Kaplowitz MD</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hadlock TD</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Levine R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Public Opin Q</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>94-101</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kaplowitz MD, Hadlock TD, Levine R. A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates. Public Opin Q. 2004;68(1):94-101. DOI: 10.1093&#47;poq&#47;nfh006</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1093&#47;poq&#47;nfh006</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="51">
        <RefAuthor>Kaye BK</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Johnson TJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Research Methodology: Taming the Cyber Frontier</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1999</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Soc Sci Comp Rev</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>323-337</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kaye BK, Johnson TJ. Research Methodology: Taming the Cyber Frontier. Soc Sci Comp Rev. 1999;17(3):323-337. DOI: 10.1177&#47;089443939901700307</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1177&#47;089443939901700307</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="52">
        <RefAuthor>Kennedy G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dalgarno B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gray K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Judd T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Waycott J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bennet S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Maton K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Krause K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bishop A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chang R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Churchwood A</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>The net-generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings from a large cross-institutional study</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kennedy G, Dalgarno B, Gray K, Judd T, Waycott J, Bennet S, Maton K, Krause K, Bishop A, Chang R, Churchwood A. The net-generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings from a large cross-institutional study. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University Press, Centre for Educational Development; 2007. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: http:&#47;&#47;www.ascilite.org.au&#47;conferences&#47;singapore07&#47;procs&#47;kennedy.pdf</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;www.ascilite.org.au&#47;conferences&#47;singapore07&#47;procs&#47;kennedy.pdf</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="53">
        <RefAuthor>Kind T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Genrich G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sodhi A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chretien KC</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Social media policies at US medical schools</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ Online</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>15</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kind T, Genrich G, Sodhi A, Chretien KC. Social media policies at US medical schools. Med Educ Online. 2010;15:15. DOI: 10.3402&#47;meo.v15i0.5324</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.3402&#47;meo.v15i0.5324</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="54">
        <RefAuthor>Knorr E</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The Year of Web Services</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2003</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>IT Magazine CIO</RefJournal>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Knorr E. The Year of Web Services. IT Magazine CIO. 2003;90.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="55">
        <RefAuthor>Koch M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fischer MR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tipold A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ehlers JP</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Can Online-Conference systems improve veterinary communication</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>AMEE 2010 Conference; 04,-08.09.2010; Glasgow (UK)</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>115</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Koch M, Fischer MR, Tipold A, Ehlers JP. Can Online-Conference systems improve veterinary communication. AMEE 2010 Conference, Glasgow (UK), 04.-08.09.2010. Dundee (UK): AMEE; 2010. S.115</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="56">
        <RefAuthor>Konrad MH</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Mobile Learning mit podcasts</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Anaesth</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>633-635</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Konrad MH. Mobile Learning mit podcasts. Anaesth. 2009;58(6):633-635. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s00101-009-1557-5</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s00101-009-1557-5</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="57">
        <RefAuthor>K&#252;hne-Eversmann L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Nussbaum C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Reincke M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fischer MR</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>CME-Fortbildungsangebote in medizinischen Fachzeitschriften: Strukturqualit&#228;t der MC-Fragen als Erfolgskontrollen</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Klinik (Munich)</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>993-1001</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>K&#252;hne-Eversmann L, Nussbaum C, Reincke M, Fischer MR. CME-Fortbildungsangebote in medizinischen Fachzeitschriften: Strukturqualit&#228;t der MC-Fragen als Erfolgskontrollen. Med Klinik (Munich). 2007;102(12):993-1001. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s00063-007-1123-3</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s00063-007-1123-3</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="58">
        <RefAuthor>Kutsch HB</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Repr&#228;sentativit&#228;t in der Online-Marktforschung</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kutsch HB. Repr&#228;sentativit&#228;t in der Online-Marktforschung. Lohmar, K&#246;ln: Josef Eul Verlag GmbH; 2007.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="59">
        <RefAuthor>Lenhart A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Purcell K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Smith A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Zickuhr K</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Social Media &#38; Mobile Internet Use Among Teens and Young Adults</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K. Social Media &#38; Mobile Internet Use Among Teens and Young Adults. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center; 2010. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;avialable from: http:&#47;&#47;pewresearch.org&#47;pubs&#47;1484&#47;social-media-mobile-internet-use-teens-millennials-fewer-blog</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;pewresearch.org&#47;pubs&#47;1484&#47;social-media-mobile-internet-use-teens-millennials-fewer-blog</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="60">
        <RefAuthor>Maranto G</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Barton M. Paradox and Promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the Sociopolitics of Social Networking in the Writing Classroom</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Comp Composition</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>36-47</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Maranto G. Barton M. Paradox and Promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the Sociopolitics of Social Networking in the Writing Classroom. Comp Composition. 2010;27(1):36-47. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.compcom.2009.11.003</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.compcom.2009.11.003</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="61">
        <RefAuthor>Margaryan A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Littlejohn A</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Are digital natives a myth or reality&#63; University students&#39; use of digital technologies</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Comp Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>429-440</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Margaryan A, Littlejohn A. Are digital natives a myth or reality&#63; University students&#39; use of digital technologies. Comp Educ. 2011;56(2):429-440. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: http:&#47;&#47;www.academy.gcal.ac.uk&#47;anoush&#47;documents&#47;DigitalNativesMythOrReality-MargaryanAndLittlejohn-draft-111208.pdf</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;www.academy.gcal.ac.uk&#47;anoush&#47;documents&#47;DigitalNativesMythOrReality-MargaryanAndLittlejohn-draft-111208.pdf</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="62">
        <RefAuthor>Masters K</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the Internet: A systematic review</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int J Med Inform</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>4-16</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Masters K. For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the Internet: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77(1):4-16. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.ijmedinf.2006.10.002</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.ijmedinf.2006.10.002</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="63">
        <RefAuthor>Merkur S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mladovsky P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mossialos E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>McKee M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Do lifelong learning and revalidation ensure that physicians are fit to practise&#63;</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Merkur S, Mladovsky P, Mossialos E, McKee M. Do lifelong learning and revalidation ensure that physicians are fit to practise&#63; Copenhagen (DK): WHO Eurpean Ministerial Conference on Health Systems; 2008. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;avialable from: http:&#47;&#47;www.euro.who.int&#47;&#95;&#95;data&#47;assets&#47;pdf&#95;file&#47;0005&#47;75434&#47;E93412.pdf</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;www.euro.who.int&#47;&#95;&#95;data&#47;assets&#47;pdf&#95;file&#47;0005&#47;75434&#47;E93412.pdf</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="64">
        <RefAuthor>Opaschowski HW</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1999</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Generation &#64;. Die Medienrevolution entl&#228;sst ihre Kinder: Leben im Informationszeitalter</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Opaschowski HW. Generation &#64;. Die Medienrevolution entl&#228;sst ihre Kinder: Leben im Informationszeitalter. Hamburg, Ostfildern: Kurt Mair Verlag; 1999.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="65">
        <RefAuthor>O&#39;Reilly</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Web 2.0 Compact Definition: Trying Again</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>O&#39;Reilly T. Web 2.0 Compact Definition: Trying Again. Sebastopol: O&#39;Reilly; 2006. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;avialable from: http:&#47;&#47;radar.oreilly.com&#47;2006&#47;12&#47;web-20-compact-definition-tryi.html</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;radar.oreilly.com&#47;2006&#47;12&#47;web-20-compact-definition-tryi.html</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="66">
        <RefAuthor>Overwien B</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Stichwort: Informelles lernen</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2005</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Z Erziehungswiss</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>339-355</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Overwien B. Stichwort: Informelles lernen. Z Erziehungswiss. 2005;8(3):339-355. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s11618-005-0144-z</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s11618-005-0144-z</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="67">
        <RefAuthor>Pempek TA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Yermolayeva</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>YA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Calvert SL</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>College students&#39; social networking experiences on Facebook</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J App Dev Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>227-238</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Pempek TA, Yermolayeva, YA, Calvert SL. College students&#39; social networking experiences on Facebook. J App Dev Psychol. 2009;30(3):227-238. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.appdev.2008.12.010</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.appdev.2008.12.010</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="68">
        <RefAuthor>Prensky M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Horizon</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1-6</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Prensky M. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. Horizon. 2001;9(5):1-6. DOI: 10.1108&#47;10748120110424816</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1108&#47;10748120110424816</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="69">
        <RefAuthor>Prinz W</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Web 2.0 - Bedeutung, Chancen und Risiken. E-Interview mit Prof. Wolfgang Prinz zum Virtual Roundtable &#34;Web Competence &#38; Responsibility&#34; Teil1</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Prinz W. Web 2.0 - Bedeutung, Chancen und Risiken. E-Interview mit Prof. Wolfgang Prinz zum Virtual Roundtable &#34;Web Competence &#38; Responsibility&#34; Teil1. M&#252;nchen: Fraunhofer FIT; 2007.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="70">
        <RefAuthor>Ramsey PG</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Carline JD</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Inui TS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Larson EB</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>LoGerfo JP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Norcini JJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wenrich MD</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Changes over time in the knowledge base of practicing internists</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1991</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>JAMA</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1103&#8211;1107</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP, Norcini JJ, Wenrich MD. Changes over time in the knowledge base of practicing internists. JAMA. 1991;266(8):1103&#8211;1107. DOI: 10.1001&#47;jama.1991.03470080073032</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1001&#47;jama.1991.03470080073032</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="71">
        <RefAuthor>Rancich AM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>P&#233;rez ML</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Morales C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gelpi RJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Beneficence, justice, and lifelong learning expressed in medical oaths</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2005</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Contin Educ Health Prof</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>211-220</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rancich AM, P&#233;rez ML, Morales C, Gelpi RJ. Beneficence, justice, and lifelong learning expressed in medical oaths. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2005;25(3):211-220. DOI: 10.1002&#47;chp.32</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1002&#47;chp.32</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="72">
        <RefAuthor>Rat der Europ&#228;ischen Union</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Bericht des Rates (Bildung) an den Europ&#228;ischen Rat &#252;ber die konkreten k&#252;nftigen Ziele der Systeme der allgemeinen und beruflichen Bildung, 5980&#47;01 EDUC 23</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rat der Europ&#228;ischen Union. Bericht des Rates (Bildung) an den Europ&#228;ischen Rat &#252;ber die konkreten k&#252;nftigen Ziele der Systeme der allgemeinen und beruflichen Bildung, 5980&#47;01 EDUC 23. Br&#252;ssel: Rat der Europ&#228;ischen Union; 2001.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="73">
        <RefAuthor>Roblyer MD</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>McDaniel M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Webb M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Herman J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Witty JV</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Int High Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>134-140</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Roblyer MD, McDaniel M, Webb M, Herman J, Witty JV. Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Int High Educ. 2010;13(3):134-140. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.iheduc.2010.03.002</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.iheduc.2010.03.002</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="74">
        <RefAuthor>Rogozea L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Miclaus R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Nemet C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Balescu A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Moleavin I</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Education, ethics and e-Communication in medicine</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Proceedings of the 8th WSEAS international conference on Distance learning and web engineering</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rogozea L, Miclaus R, Nemet C, Balescu A, Moleavin I. Education, ethics and e-Communication in medicine. In: Zamanillo S&#225;inz de la Maza JM, L&#243;pez Espi PL (Hrsg). Proceedings of the 8th WSEAS international conference on Distance learning and web engineering. Wisconsin&#47;USA: World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS); 2008.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="75">
        <RefAuthor>Sandars J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Homer M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Reflective learning and the Net Generation</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Teach</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>877-879</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Sandars J, Homer M. Reflective learning and the Net Generation. Med Teach. 2008;30(9-10):877-879. DOI: 10.1080&#47;01421590802263490</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;01421590802263490</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="76">
        <RefAuthor>Sandars J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Morrison C</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>What is the Net Generation&#63; The challenge for future medical education</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Teach</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>85-88</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Sandars J, Morrison C. What is the Net Generation&#63; The challenge for future medical education. Med Teach. 2007;29(2-3):85-88. DOI: 10.1080&#47;01421590601176380</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;01421590601176380</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="77">
        <RefAuthor>Sandars J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Schroter S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Postgrad Med J</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>759-762</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Sandars J, Schroter S. Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(986):759-762. DOI: 10.1136&#47;pgmj.2007.063123</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1136&#47;pgmj.2007.063123</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="78">
        <RefAuthor>Sax LJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gilmartin SK</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bryant AN</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2003</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Res High Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>409-432</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Sax LJ, Gilmartin SK, Bryant AN. Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys. Res High Educ. 2003;44(4):409-432. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: http:&#47;&#47;illume.arizona.edu&#47;sites&#47;illume.arizona.edu&#47;files&#47;nonrespbiast.pdf</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;illume.arizona.edu&#47;sites&#47;illume.arizona.edu&#47;files&#47;nonrespbiast.pdf</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="79">
        <RefAuthor>Schulmeister R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Gibt es eine Net-Generation&#63;</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Schulmeister R. Gibt es eine Net-Generation&#63; Hamburg: Universit&#228;t Hamburg; 2009.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="80">
        <RefAuthor>Shaughnessy AF</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Slawson DC</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Are we providing doctors with the training and tools for lifelong learning&#63;</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1999</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMJ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1280</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Shaughnessy AF, Slawson DC. Are we providing doctors with the training and tools for lifelong learning&#63; BMJ. 1999;319(7220):1280. DOI: 10.1136&#47;bmj.319.7220.1280</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1136&#47;bmj.319.7220.1280</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="81">
        <RefAuthor>Shekelle PG</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ortiz E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rhodes S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Morton SC</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Eccles MP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Grimshaw JM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Woolf SH</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated&#63;</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>JAMA</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1461&#8211;1467</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Shekelle PG, Ortiz E, Rhodes S, Morton SC, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Woolf SH. Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated&#63; JAMA. 2001;286(12):1461&#8211;1467. DOI: 10.1001&#47;jama.286.12.1461</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1001&#47;jama.286.12.1461</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="82">
        <RefAuthor>Shin DH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shin YJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Choo H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Beom K</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Smartphones as smart pedagogical tools: Implications for smartphones as u-learning devices</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Comp Human Beh</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>2207-2214</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Shin DH, Shin YJ, Choo H, Beom K. Smartphones as smart pedagogical tools: Implications for smartphones as u-learning devices. Comp Human Beh. 2011;27(6):2207-2214. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.chb.2011.06.017</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.chb.2011.06.017</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="83">
        <RefAuthor>Srivastava S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>John OP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gosling SD</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Potter J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change&#63;</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2003</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Pers Soc Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1041-1053</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Srivastava S, John OP, Gosling SD, Potter J. Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change&#63; J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84(5):1041-1053. DOI: 10.1037&#47;0022-3514.84.5.1041</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1037&#47;0022-3514.84.5.1041</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="84">
        <RefAuthor>Stark B</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Konstanten und Ver&#228;nderungen der Mediennutzung in &#214;sterreich - Empirische Befunde aus den Media-Analyse-Daten (1996 &#8211;2007)</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>SWS-Rundschau</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>130-153</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Stark B. Konstanten und Ver&#228;nderungen der Mediennutzung in &#214;sterreich - Empirische Befunde aus den Media-Analyse-Daten (1996 &#8211;2007). SWS-Rundschau. 2009;49(2):130-153.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="85">
        <RefAuthor>Straub R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Is the world open&#63;</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>eLearn Paper</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>3</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Straub R. Is the world open&#63; eLearn Paper. 2008;8:3.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="86">
        <RefAuthor>Swanwick T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Informal learning in postgraduate medical education: from cognitivism to &#39;culturism&#39;</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2005</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>859-865</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Swanwick T. Informal learning in postgraduate medical education: from cognitivism to &#39;culturism&#39;. Med Educ. 2005;39(8):859-865. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2929.2005.02224.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2929.2005.02224.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="87">
        <RefAuthor>Tapscott D</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1997</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Tapscott D. Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="88">
        <RefAuthor>Thompson L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dawson K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ferdig R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Black EW</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Boyer J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Coutts J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Black NP</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The Intersection of Online Social Networking with Medical Professionalism</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Gen Intern Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>954-957</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Thompson L, Dawson K, Ferdig R, Black EW, Boyer J, Coutts J, Black NP. The Intersection of Online Social Networking with Medical Professionalism. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):954-957. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s11606-008-0538-8</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s11606-008-0538-8</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="89">
        <RefAuthor>TKNDS</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Berufsordnung der Tier&#228;rztekammer Niedersachsen K&#246;rperschaft des &#246;ffentlichen Rechts</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Dtsch Tier&#228;rztebl</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>949</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>TKNDS. Berufsordnung der Tier&#228;rztekammer Niedersachsen K&#246;rperschaft des &#246;ffentlichen Rechts. Dtsch Tier&#228;rztebl. 2011;7:949.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="90">
        <RefAuthor>Van Eimeren B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Frees B</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Drei von vier Deutschen im Netz &#8211; ein Ende des digitalen Grabens in Sicht&#63;</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Persp</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>334-349</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Van Eimeren B, Frees B. Drei von vier Deutschen im Netz &#8211; ein Ende des digitalen Grabens in Sicht&#63; Med Persp. 2011;7(8):334-349.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="91">
        <RefAuthor>Van Selm M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Jankowski N</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Conducting Online Surveys</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Qual Quant</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>435-456</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Van Selm M, Jankowski N. Conducting Online Surveys. Qual Quant. 2006;40(3):435-456. DOI: 10.1007&#47;s11135-005-8081-8</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;s11135-005-8081-8</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="92">
        <RefAuthor>Veen W</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A new force for change: Homo Zappiens</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2003</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Learn Cit</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>5-7</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Veen W. A new force for change: Homo Zappiens. Learn Cit. 2003;(7):5-7.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="93">
        <RefAuthor>Veen W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vrakking B</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Homo Zappiens: Growing Up in a Digital Age</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Veen W, Vrakking B. Homo Zappiens: Growing Up in a Digital Age. Network: Educ Pr Ltd; 2006.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="35">
        <RefAuthor>Franklin T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>van Harmelen M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Web 2.0 for Content for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Franklin T, van Harmelen M. Web 2.0 for Content for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. London: The Observatory of Borderless Higher Education; 2007. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: http:&#47;&#47;190.208.26.22&#47;files&#47;web2-content-learning-and-teaching.pdf</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;190.208.26.22&#47;files&#47;web2-content-learning-and-teaching.pdf</RefLink>
      </Reference>
    </References>
    <Media>
      <Tables>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">1en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">1de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 1: Internet use (multiple answers possible)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Tabelle 1: Internetnutzung (Mehrfachantworten m&#246;glich)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>2</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">2en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">2de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 2: Comparison of audio and video podcast use among students and veterinarians (multiple answers possible)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Tabelle 2: Vergleich Audio- und Videopodcastnutzung zwischen Studierenden und Tier&#228;rzteschaft (mehrere Antwortm&#246;glichkeiten)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <NoOfTables>2</NoOfTables>
      </Tables>
      <Figures>
        <Figure format="png" height="387" width="612">
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">1en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">1de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 1: Social networks (students in blue, vets in red - multiple answers possible)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Abbildung 1: Soziale Netzwerke (Studierende blau, Tier&#228;rzteschaft rot - Mehrfachantworten m&#246;glich)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <Figure format="png" height="289" width="481">
          <MediaNo>2</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">2en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">2de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 2: Internet forums (students in blue, veterinarians in red - multiple answers possible)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Abbildung 2: Internetforen (Studierende blau, Tier&#228;rzteschaft rot - Mehrfachantworten m&#246;glich)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <Figure format="png" height="245" width="283">
          <MediaNo>3</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">3en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">3de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 3: Passive use of wikis (students in blue, veterinarians in red)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Abbildung 3: Passive Nutzung Wikis (Studierende blau, Tier&#228;rzteschaft rot)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <Figure format="png" height="234" width="281">
          <MediaNo>4</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">4en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">4de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 4: Active use of wikis (students in blue, veterinarians in red)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Abbildung 4: Aktive Nutzung Wikis (Studierende blau, Tier&#228;rzteschaft rot)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <Figure format="png" height="440" width="605">
          <MediaNo>5</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">5en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">5de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Figure 5: Instant messaging (students in blue, veterinarians in red - multiple answers possible)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Abbildung 5: Instantmessenger (Studierende blau, Tier&#228;rzteschaft rot - mehrere Antwortm&#246;glichkeiten)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Figure>
        <NoOfPictures>5</NoOfPictures>
      </Figures>
      <InlineFigures>
        <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures>
      </InlineFigures>
      <Attachments>
        <NoOfAttachments>0</NoOfAttachments>
      </Attachments>
    </Media>
  </OrigData>
</GmsArticle>