<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" standalone="no"?>
<GmsArticle xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <MetaData>
    <Identifier>zma000953</Identifier>
    <IdentifierDoi>10.3205/zma000953</IdentifierDoi>
    <IdentifierUrn>urn:nbn:de:0183-zma0009538</IdentifierUrn>
    <ArticleType language="en">article &#8211; research paper</ArticleType>
    <ArticleType language="de">Artikel &#8211; Forschungsarbeit</ArticleType>
    <TitleGroup>
      <Title language="en">Do medical students like communication&#63; Validation of the German CSAS (Communication Skills Attitude Scale)</Title>
      <TitleTranslated language="de">M&#246;gen Medizinstudierende Kommunikation&#63; Validierung der deutschsprachigen CSAS (Communication Skills Attitude Scale)</TitleTranslated>
    </TitleGroup>
    <CreatorList>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Busch</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Busch</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Anne-Kathrin</Firstname>
          <Initials>AK</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Psychic Health, Division for Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>Universit&#228;tsklinikum Leipzig, Abteilung f&#252;r Medizinpsychologie und Medizinsoziologie, Leipzig, Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Email>frau.akbusch&#64;gmail.com</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Rockenbauch</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Rockenbauch</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Katrin</Firstname>
          <Initials>K</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Psychic Health, Division for Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Ph.-Rosenthal-Stra&#223;e 55, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany, Phone: &#43;49 (0)341&#47;97-18808, Fax: &#43;49 (0)341&#47;97-18809<Affiliation>University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Psychic Health, Division for Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig, Germany</Affiliation></Address>
        <Address language="de">Universit&#228;tsklinikum Leipzig, Abteilung f&#252;r Medizinpsychologie und Medizinsoziologie, Ph.-Rosenthal-Stra&#223;e 55, D-04103 Leipzig, Deutschland, Tel.: &#43;49 (0)341&#47;97-18808, Fax: &#43;49 (0)341&#47;97-18809<Affiliation>Universit&#228;tsklinikum Leipzig, Abteilung f&#252;r Medizinpsychologie und Medizinsoziologie, Leipzig, Deutschland</Affiliation></Address>
        <Email>katrin.rockenbauch&#64;medizin.uni-leipzig.de</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="yes" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Schmutzer</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Schmutzer</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Gabriele</Firstname>
          <Initials>G</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Psychic Health, Division for Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>Universit&#228;tsklinikum Leipzig, Abteilung f&#252;r Medizinpsychologie und Medizinsoziologie, Leipzig, Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Email>gabriele.schmutzer&#64;medizin.uni-leipzig.de</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
      <Creator>
        <PersonNames>
          <Lastname>Br&#228;hler</Lastname>
          <LastnameHeading>Br&#228;hler</LastnameHeading>
          <Firstname>Elmar</Firstname>
          <Initials>E</Initials>
        </PersonNames>
        <Address language="en">
          <Affiliation>University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Psychic Health, Division for Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Leipzig, Germany</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Address language="de">
          <Affiliation>Universit&#228;tsklinikum Leipzig, Abteilung f&#252;r Medizinpsychologie und Medizinsoziologie, Leipzig, Deutschland</Affiliation>
        </Address>
        <Email>elmar.braehler&#64;medizin.uni-leipzig.de</Email>
        <Creatorrole corresponding="no" presenting="no">author</Creatorrole>
      </Creator>
    </CreatorList>
    <PublisherList>
      <Publisher>
        <Corporation>
          <Corporatename>German Medical Science GMS Publishing House</Corporatename>
        </Corporation>
        <Address>D&#252;sseldorf</Address>
      </Publisher>
    </PublisherList>
    <SubjectGroup>
      <SubjectheadingDDB>610</SubjectheadingDDB>
      <Keyword language="en">communication</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">medical education</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">undergraduate</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="en">attitude of health personnel</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Kommunikation</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Medizinstudierende</Keyword>
      <Keyword language="de">Einstellungen</Keyword>
      <SectionHeading language="en">medicine</SectionHeading>
      <SectionHeading language="de">Humanmedizin</SectionHeading>
    </SubjectGroup>
    <DateReceived>20140319</DateReceived>
    <DateRevised>20140619</DateRevised>
    <DateAccepted>20141030</DateAccepted>
    <DatePublishedList>
      
    <DatePublished>20150211</DatePublished></DatePublishedList>
    <Language>engl</Language>
    <LanguageTranslation>germ</LanguageTranslation>
    <License license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
      <AltText language="en">This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</AltText>
      <AltText language="de">Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung).</AltText>
    </License>
    <SourceGroup>
      <Journal>
        <ISSN>1860-3572</ISSN>
        <Volume>32</Volume>
        <Issue>1</Issue>
        <JournalTitle>GMS Zeitschrift f&#252;r Medizinische Ausbildung</JournalTitle>
        <JournalTitleAbbr>GMS Z Med Ausbild</JournalTitleAbbr>
      </Journal>
    </SourceGroup>
    <ArticleNo>11</ArticleNo>
  </MetaData>
  <OrigData>
    <Abstract language="de" linked="yes"><Pgraph><Mark1>Zielsetzung: </Mark1>Die Lehre &#228;rztlicher Gespr&#228;chskompetenz schlie&#223;t die Vermittlung f&#246;rderlicher Einstellungen ein. Mittels der Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS) werden Einstellungen Medizinstudierender zum Erwerb von kommunikativer Kompetenz erfasst. Ziel der vorliegenden Erhebung ist die Entwicklung einer deutschsprachigen CSAS-Fassung (CSAS-G), um die Einstellungen in einer deutschsprachigen Kohorte zu messen. Erg&#228;nzend untersuchten wir den Einfluss demographischer Merkmale auf die Einstellungswerte.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Methodik:</Mark1> Wir erstellten die CSAS-G und befragten in unserer Untersuchung 529 Studienteilnehmer aus drei verschiedenen Studienjahren. Wir f&#252;hrten eine explorative wie konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse durch und verglichen anschlie&#223;end die Einstellungswerte nach Studienjahr. Ebenso wurde eine multiple Regressionsanalyse berechnet.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Ergebnisse:</Mark1> Die konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse best&#228;tigte das zweifaktorielle  System aus der explorativen Faktorenanalyse. Die Studierenden gaben wenig Zustimmung zu negativen Einstellungen und m&#228;&#223;ige Zustimmung zu positiven Einstellungen an. Die Einstellungswerte differieren signifikant nach Geschlechtszugeh&#246;rigkeit.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Schlussfolgerung: </Mark1>Die CSAS-G eignet sich zur Einsch&#228;tzung von Einstellungsauspr&#228;gungen zu Kommunikationskompetenz in deutschsprachigen Kohorten. Die Medizinstudierenden unserer Studie zeigten grundlegend eine positive Einstellung. Weiterf&#252;hrende Untersuchungen sind erforderlich, um die Einstellungen deutschsprachiger Medizinstudierender zu kommunikativer Kompetenz zu erfassen und zu verstehen. </Pgraph></Abstract>
    <Abstract language="en" linked="yes"><Pgraph><Mark1>Objectives: </Mark1>Attitudes towards communication skills of medical undergraduates can be gathered using the Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS). We aimed to develop a German version of the CSAS (CSAS-G) in order to explore attitudes towards communication skills in a German cohort. Additionally the potential influence of demographic factors was examined.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Methods: </Mark1>We realized the CSAS-G and conducted a survey with 529 participants from 3 different years of study. We then carried out an explorative as well as confirmatory factor analysis and compared the attitudinal scores. Multiple regression analysis was performed.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Results: </Mark1>The confirmatory analysis confirmed the two-subscale system revealed by the explorative factor analysis. Students indicate low levels of negative attitudes and moderate levels of positive attitudes. Attitudinal scores differ significantly in relation to gender.</Pgraph><Pgraph><Mark1>Conclusion: </Mark1>The CSAS-G can be used in German cohorts to evaluate attitudes towards communication skills. Medical students in our study show basically a positive approach. Further investigation is necessary to explore and understand attitudes towards communication skills of German medical students.</Pgraph></Abstract>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Introduction">
      <MainHeadline>Introduction</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The physician-patient encounter presents an interpersonal process of highest complexity. The decisive key for the arrangement of a healing patient-doctor relationship is professional communication <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>. With regard to the variety of patients&#180; needs a physician is supposed to master different communicative challenges. Research has revealed that professional communication can be acquired as &#180;a series of learned skills&#180; <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. Considering communication skills training in medical education, a process towards increasingly detailed educational objectives is observed <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>. To support an adequate communication skills teaching and learning medical education integrates attitude development <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink> as underlined by the ongoing professionalism debate <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>. Attitudinal work deepens the learners&#180; understanding of different communication issues and skills allow the effective transfer into practice <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. Ajzen as one of the leading attitude scientists states that an &#96;attitude represents a summary evaluation of a psychological object captured in such attribute dimensions as good-bad, harmful-beneficial, pleasant-unpleasant, and likable-dislikable.&#180; <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. Consequently attitudes facilitate the adaption of the individual to the environment <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>. Furthermore, according to the Theory of Reasoned Action, attitudes influence behavior <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>. In a qualitative study concerning the Attitude-Social Influence-Self-Efficacy-Model the crucial role of affective components such as emotions with regard to behavior is indicated <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>. Psychosocial attitudes of primary care physicians are related to their communication behaviors as shown by Levinson and Roter <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>. High levels of psychosocial orientation in physicians and medical students are desirable therefore. In contrast Eron <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink> noticed a decreasing psychosocial orientation in medical students and shaped the term of dehumanization already in the middle of the twentieth century. This development seems to continue: contemporary studies show lack of increase or even decline in empathy <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink> and patient-centeredness <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink>. The given trend is mainly attributed to an assumed negative influence of increasing experience in patient interaction. As consequence the third year in medical education seems to be critical for psychosocial orientation since most medical curricula include more direct patient contact after year two <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>. Current research literature on empathy decline reveals distress as second key factor <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>. Research literature offers an instrument asking for attitudes towards communication skills of medical students: the Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS) <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>. Since its development multiple surveys included the original English-speaking or a translated CSAS-version proving the continuing interest in attitudes towards communication skills (see table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>). A German CSAS version was created and applied with German speaking medical students in Hungary <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>. The corresponding publication is written in Hungarian and therefore inaccessible for non-Hungarian speaking audience.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Several studies have examined attitudinal scores before and after a communication skills training <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>. Research using the CSAS shows different patterns of attitude development during medical education, longing from decrease <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink> to increase <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. Anvik and colleagues found stable cognitive attitudes in contrast to decreasing affective attitudes <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink>, which is similar to the findings of empathy research <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>. Furthermore attitudes towards communication skills appear to be less positive in students with higher levels of state anxiety <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>So far no data about attitudes towards communication skills of German medical students is available. In order to close this gap in educational research a study with the following aims was carried out:</Pgraph><Pgraph><OrderedList><ListItem level="1" levelPosition="1" numString="1.">Developing a German CSAS version (CSAS-G), </ListItem><ListItem level="1" levelPosition="2" numString="2.">validation of CSAS-G with a German cohort,</ListItem><ListItem level="1" levelPosition="3" numString="3.">exploring the attitudinal scores in different years of study and</ListItem><ListItem level="1" levelPosition="4" numString="4.">investigating the potential impact of demographic factors on attitudinal scores.</ListItem></OrderedList></Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Einleitung">
      <MainHeadline>Einleitung</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Die Arzt-Patienten-Beziehung entspricht einem zwischenmenschlichen Prozess h&#246;chster Komplexit&#228;t. Die Schl&#252;sselkompetenz zur Gestaltung eines heilsamen Arzt-Patienten-Verh&#228;ltnisses ist professionelle Kommunikation <TextLink reference="1"></TextLink>. Diese bef&#228;higt den Arzt, verschiedenste kommunikative Herausforderungen zu bew&#228;ltigen, um den vielf&#228;ltigen Patientenbed&#252;rfnissen gerecht werden zu k&#246;nnen. Forschungsergebnisse weisen darauf hin, dass professionelle Kommunikation als &#8222;Serie erlernter F&#228;higkeiten&#8220; (&#8218;series of learned skills&#8216;) angeeignet werden kann <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. In der medizinischen Ausbildung wird die Vermittlung kommunikativer Kompetenz in zunehmend detaillierten Ausbildungszielen festgelegt <TextLink reference="3"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="4"></TextLink>. Die Lehre sowie der Erwerb von Gespr&#228;chskompetenz schlie&#223;en die Entwicklung f&#246;rderlicher Einstellungen ein <TextLink reference="5"></TextLink>, wie die anhaltende Diskussion zum Thema Professionalit&#228;t veranschaulicht <TextLink reference="6"></TextLink>. F&#252;r den Lernenden erm&#246;glicht die Auseinandersetzung mit den eigenen Einstellungen eine Vertiefung des Verst&#228;ndnisses unterschiedlicher Bereiche professioneller Kommunikation. Der Erwerb kommunikativer F&#228;higkeiten erm&#246;glicht den Transfer der Einstellungen in die Kommunikationspraxis <TextLink reference="2"></TextLink>. Ajzen, einer der f&#252;hrenden Einstellungsforscher, konstatiert, dass &#8222;Einstellung eine zusammenfassende Bewertung eines psychologischen Objektes darstellt, das in Merkmalsdimensionen wie gut-schlecht, sch&#228;dlich-n&#252;tzlich, angenehm-unangenehm, sympathisch-unsympathisch erfasst wurde&#8220; (&#96;attitude represents a summary evaluation of a psychological object captured in such attribute dimensions as good-bad, harmful-beneficial, pleasant-unpleasant, and likable-dislikable.&#180;) <TextLink reference="7"></TextLink>. Folglich  erleichtern Einstellungen die individuelle Anpassung an die Umgebung <TextLink reference="8"></TextLink>. Weiterhin beeinflussen Einstellungen gem&#228;&#223; der Theorie des &#252;berlegten Handelns (Theory of Reasoned Action) das Verhalten <TextLink reference="9"></TextLink>. Den deutlichen Einfluss auf das Verhalten affektiver Einstellungskomponenten wie Emotionen, veranschaulicht eine aktuelle qualitative Studie an Hand des &#8222;Attitude-Social Influence-Self-Efficacy-Model&#8220; <TextLink reference="10"></TextLink>. Psychosoziale Einstellungen von Haus&#228;rzten stehen in Verbindung zu ihrem Kommunikationsverhalten, wie Levinson und Roter zeigen konnten <TextLink reference="11"></TextLink>. Eine starke psychosoziale Orientierung von &#196;rzten und Medizinstudierenden ist daher w&#252;nschenswert. Bereits Mitte des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts erkannte Eron <TextLink reference="12"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="13"></TextLink> eine sinkende psychosoziale Orientierung bei Medizinstudierenden. Daraufhin formte er den Begriff der Dehumanisierung. Dieser hat &#8211; wie heutige Studien zeigen - nichts an Aktualit&#228;t eingeb&#252;&#223;t: im Verlauf der &#228;rztlichen Ausbildung entwickeln sich Empathie <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="15"></TextLink> und Patientenorientierung <TextLink reference="16"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="17"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="18"></TextLink> r&#252;ckl&#228;ufig. Als urs&#228;chlich wird  der anscheinend ung&#252;nstige Einfluss zunehmender Patientenkontakte angenommen. Da die meisten medizinischen Curricula nach dem zweiten Ausbildungsjahr mehr  Patienteninteraktion beinhalten, bildet das dritte Jahr ein sensibles Zeitfenster f&#252;r die weitere Entwicklung der psychosozialen Orientierung <TextLink reference="19"></TextLink>. Als zweiter Hauptverursacher des Empathie-Verlusts gilt Stress <TextLink reference="14"></TextLink>. Die Fachliteratur bietet zur Erfassung der Einstellungen  Medizinstudierender zu kommunikativer Kompetenz den Fragebogen &#8222;Communication Skills Attitude Scale&#8220; (CSAS) <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>. Dem anhaltenden Interesse an Einstellungen zu Gespr&#228;chskompetenz entsprechend, wurde die CSAS in zahlreichen Studien eingesetzt. Dabei kamen die englischsprachige Originalversion oder deren &#220;bersetzung zur Anwendung (siehe Tabelle 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>). Aus Ungarn stammt eine deutschsprachige CSAS-Version <TextLink reference="21"></TextLink>. Die zugeh&#246;rige Publikation ist in ungarischer Sprache verfasst und daher unzug&#228;nglich f&#252;r weite Teile des Fachpublikums.</Pgraph><Pgraph>In einigen der in Tabelle 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/> genannten Studien wurden Einstellungswerte vor und nach einem Kommunikationstraining untersucht <TextLink reference="22"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="23"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="24"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="26"></TextLink>. Die CSAS-basierte Forschung zeigt gegenl&#228;ufige Einstellungsentwicklungen w&#228;hrend der medizinischen Ausbildung. &#220;berwiegend fand sich ein R&#252;ckgang positiver Einstellungen <TextLink reference="27"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="28"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="29"></TextLink>, den bisher nur eine Untersuchung widerlegt <TextLink reference="30"></TextLink>. Die Arbeitsgruppe um Anvik <TextLink reference="31"></TextLink> entdeckte stabile kognitive Einstellungen im Verlauf des Studiums. Im Kontrast dazu sanken die affektiven Einstellungen. Diese Feststellung entspricht den Ergebnissen der Empathie-Forschung <TextLink reference="32"></TextLink>. Bei Studierenden mit h&#246;herem &#196;ngstlichkeitsniveau wurden weniger positive Einstellungen zu Gespr&#228;chskompetenz belegt <TextLink reference="33"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Bislang fehlen Daten, die die Einstellungen deutscher Medizinstudierender zu kommunikativer Kompetenz beleuchten. Um diese L&#252;cke in der Ausbildungsforschung zu schlie&#223;en, wurde diese Studie mit folgenden Zielen durchgef&#252;hrt: </Pgraph><Pgraph><OrderedList><ListItem level="1" levelPosition="1" numString="1.">Entwicklung einer deutschsprachigen CSAS-Version (CSAS-G),</ListItem><ListItem level="1" levelPosition="2" numString="2.">Validierung der CSAS-G mit einer Kohorte deutscher Studierender,</ListItem><ListItem level="1" levelPosition="3" numString="3.">Vergleich der Einstellungswerte nach Studienjahr und</ListItem><ListItem level="1" levelPosition="4" numString="4.">Ermittlung m&#246;glicher Einfl&#252;sse demografischer Faktoren auf die Einstellungswerte.</ListItem></OrderedList></Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Methods">
      <MainHeadline>Methods</MainHeadline><SubHeadline2>Setting</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>The cohort in this cross-sectional study comprises students in years 1 (n&#61;88), 2 (n&#61;355) and 4 (n&#61;86). Year 1 students&#180; experience in patient contact depends on individual&#180;s activities before entering medical school. The curriculum in the Leipzig university provides lectures on &#180;Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology&#180; without any communication skills training in year 1. Year 2 students attend two communication skills courses. The first part covers 18 hours focusing general communication combined with examples taken from physician-patient communication. Elements such as cooperative communication, active listening <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink> and regulation of emotions are integrated. The second training unit covers 21 hours and comprises specific conversation techniques in the physician-patient encounter such as shared-decision making, dealing with taboos, breaking bad news or life-style counseling <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>. Year 4 students have comparatively much patient contact due to a regular bed-side teaching and compulsory clerkship. In the clinical part no communication skills training is offered. </Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Data collection</SubHeadline2><SubHeadline3>1. Procedure</SubHeadline3><Pgraph>The original CSAS was translated into German using standard forward-backward procedure supported by a native English speaker. The first author contacted Charlotte Rees via email for detailed clarification of item meaning. The two steps of translation process were performed repeatedly and supplemented by a pretest until a satisfying German version close to the English original was developed (see table 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="table"/>, translated CSAS is part of the German version of this article). </Pgraph><Pgraph>Since students from three different years of medical school with different access to communication skills training were involved, communication skills training related wordings were adapted. Year 1 students have had no contact to communication skills training when answering the questionnaire. Therefore item 12 &#8222;Learning communication skills is fun.&#8220; was modified into  &#8222;Learning communication skills will be fun.&#8220; No adaption of wording was indicated for year two students that filled out the CSAS-G shortly after they had attended the communication skills training. </Pgraph><Pgraph>During courses participants had been invited to participate voluntarily. They were informed about anonymous data analysis. The questionnaires were passed to the students by one of the authors giving a short instruction without mentioning the aim of the study. Sensitive personal information was not required and no kind of experiment was part of the study. Therefore ethical approval was not necessary considering rules of ethics commission of the University of Leipzig.</Pgraph><SubHeadline3>2. Instrument</SubHeadline3><Pgraph>Students of our subject group completed the CSAS-G together with a demographic questionnaire including year of study, age and gender. The CSAS itself consists of 26 items with statements towards learning, teaching and using communication skills. Responders choose along a five-point Likert scale that ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Therefore higher values express stronger attitudes. According to the original validation the CSAS measures attitudes along two dimensions: </Pgraph><Pgraph><OrderedList><ListItem level="1" levelPosition="1" numString="1.">Positive attitude scale (PAS) and </ListItem><ListItem level="1" levelPosition="2" numString="2.">Negative attitude scale (NAS).</ListItem></OrderedList></Pgraph><SubHeadline3>3. Statistics</SubHeadline3><Pgraph>Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 18.0). An explorative factor analysis with direct oblimin rotation was conducted and Cronbach&#180;s a for each factor was calculated leading to a reduction in item numbers of the two subscales. Confirmatory factor analysis to test the factorial structure was performed for the reduced subscales and the original subscales additionally. AMOS 20 was used as statistical program for this purpose. The confirmatory factor analyses were compared to each other based on the following model fit indices: the minimum discrepancy, divided by its degrees of freedom (CMIN&#47;DF); the goodness-of-fit-index (GFI); the normed-fit-index (NFI); the comparative-fit-index (CFI); the Tucker-Lewis-Index (TLI); the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA); and the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The ratio CMIN&#47;DF should be possibly small for a satisfactory model fit <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>. GFI ought to range between 0.97 and 1 and NFI is ideally higher than 0.95 <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>. A good model fit is indicated by values of CFI and TLI close to 0.95 or even higher <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="40"></TextLink>. RMSEA should be 0.05 or smaller. A descriptive indicator of the badness of fit is provided by the AIC. It allows comparisons of two varying models whereby the lower AIC belongs to the preferable model <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>. In order to test each model we used covariance matrices and the maximum likelihood method approach. Attitude scores were calculated by dividing the sum of item scores of each subscale by the number of items per subscale according to factor analysis result. Correlation between attitude scores and demographic characteristics were studied using Pearson&#180;s correlation coefficient. Normality was assessed by the help of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, which indicated a missing normal distribution. Therefore we used the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis-H-test for comparison of CSAS scores of different study years. As a result significant rank differences were revealed. Assuming that significant non-parametric test results justify using a parametric test without normal distribution, we conducted t-tests to study differences of male and female CSAS scores. Comparisons between CSAS scores of the three different years of study were based on single factor variance analyses with post-hoc Scheff&#233;-test. To determine group differences the following levels of significance were applied: &#42;p&#60;0.05, &#42;&#42;p&#60;0.01 and &#42;&#42;&#42;p&#60;0.001. Effect sizes (d) were calculated for significant differences in attitude scores because of varying subcohort sizes. Effect sizes d&#62;0.50 are interpreted as large, 0.50&#62;d&#62;0.30 as medium, 0.30&#62;d&#62;0.10 as small and d&#60;0.10 as trivial <TextLink reference="41"></TextLink>. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Methodik">
      <MainHeadline>Methodik</MainHeadline><SubHeadline2>Setting</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>Die Kohorte dieser Querschnittsstudie umfasst Studierende aus den Jahren eins  (n&#61;88), zwei (n&#61;355) und vier (n&#61;86). Das Curriculum der Universit&#228;t Leipzig enth&#228;lt im ersten Studienjahr Vorlesungen im Fach &#8222;Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie&#8220;. Ein Kommunikationstraining findet nicht statt. Die Erfahrungen mit Patientenkontakt sind somit f&#252;r die Befragten aus dem ersten Studienjahr begrenzt auf deren individuellen T&#228;tigkeiten vor Aufnahme des Studiums. Studierende des zweiten Studienjahres nehmen an zwei Gespr&#228;chsf&#252;hrungskursen teil. Der erste Kurs thematisiert &#252;ber 18 Stunden Grundlagenwissen zu Kommunikation kombiniert mit Beispielen aus der Arzt-Patienten-Kommunikation. Als weitere Elemente werden Aspekte der kooperativen Kommunikation, des aktiven Zuh&#246;rens <TextLink reference="34"></TextLink> und der Regulation von Emotionen  integriert. Im zweiten Kurs &#225; 21 Stunden werden spezifische Konversationstechniken der Arzt-Patienten-Beziehung vermittelt. Dazu z&#228;hlen partizipative Entscheidungsfindung (PEF; englisch: shared decision-making, SDM), Umgang mit Tabus, &#220;berbringen schlechter Nachrichten und Beratung zur Lebensstilmodifikation <TextLink reference="35"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="36"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="37"></TextLink>. Im klinischen Studienabschnitt wird an der Leipziger Medizinfakult&#228;t kein regul&#228;res Kommunikationstraining angeboten. Studierende aus dem vierten Studienjahr erleben im Unterricht am Krankenbett und in Pflichtfamulaturen vergleichsweise viel Patientenkontakt. </Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Datenerfassung</SubHeadline2><SubHeadline3>1. Durchf&#252;hrung</SubHeadline3><Pgraph>Die Original-CSAS wurde mittels des standardisierten Vorw&#228;rts-R&#252;ckw&#228;rts-Verfahrens ins Deutsche &#252;bersetzt. Die Erstautorin kontaktierte mehrfach Verfasserin Rees per Email, um die genaue Bedeutung der Items zu kl&#228;ren, und nahm dann die &#220;bersetzung ins Deutsche vor. F&#252;r die R&#252;ck&#252;bersetzung wurde ein englischer Muttersprachler engagiert. Die beiden &#220;bersetzungsschritte wurden wiederholt und durch einen Vorversuch erg&#228;nzt, bis eine zufriedenstellende deutschsprachige  CSAS-Fassung nahe am englischen Original entwickelt war (siehe Tabelle 2 <ImgLink imgNo="2" imgType="table"/>).</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die gewonnene CSAS-G bedurfte vereinzelter Item-Modifikationen, da  Medizinstudierende aus drei Studienjahren und mit unterschiedlichem Bezug zum Gespr&#228;chsf&#252;hrungskurs involviert wurden. Studierende aus dem ersten Studienjahr hatten zum Befragungszeitpunkt noch kein Kommunikationstraining absolviert. Daher wurde Item 12 &#8222;Es macht mir Spa&#223;, Gespr&#228;chsf&#252;hrung zu lernen&#8220; durch &#8222;Es wird mir Spa&#223; machen, Gespr&#228;chsf&#252;hrung zu lernen.&#8220; ersetzt. Eine Anpassung von Formulierungen f&#252;r Studierende aus dem zweiten Studienjahr war nicht n&#246;tig, da diese den Fragebogen kurz nach ihrer Teilnahme am Gespr&#228;chsf&#252;hrungskurs ausf&#252;llten.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Im Rahmen von Lehrveranstaltungen wurden Studierende zur freiwilligen Studienteilnahme eingeladen. Sie wurden &#252;ber die anonymisierte Datenauswertung  informiert. Die Frageb&#246;gen wurden von einem der Autoren an die Studierenden ausgeteilt, wobei eine kurze Anleitung gegeben wurde ohne das Studienziel zu nennen. Sensible personenbezogene Informationen wurden nicht erfasst. Auf jegliche Form von Experiment wurde verzichtet. Eine Zustimmung der Ethikkommission der Universit&#228;t Leipzig war daher nicht notwendig. </Pgraph><SubHeadline3>2. Messinstrument</SubHeadline3><Pgraph>Die Teilnehmer f&#252;llten die CSAS-G zusammen mit einem demografischen Kurz-Fragebogen aus. Dieser erfasste Studienjahr, Alter und Geschlecht. Die CSAS-G besteht aus 26 Items mit Aussagen zu Vermittlung, Erlernen und Anwendung von Kommunikationskompetenz. Die Beantwortung erfolgt entlang einer f&#252;nfteiligen Likert Skala von eins (stimme &#252;berhaupt nicht zu) bis f&#252;nf (stimme vollst&#228;ndig zu). Folglich  stehen h&#246;here Werte f&#252;r st&#228;rkere Einstellungsauspr&#228;gungen. Gem&#228;&#223; der urspr&#252;nglichen Konstruktion misst die CSAS getrennt positive (Positive attitude scale (PAS)) und negative Einstellungsanteile (Negative attitude scale (NAS)).</Pgraph><SubHeadline3>3. Statistische Auswertung</SubHeadline3><Pgraph>Die statistische Auswertung wurde mit SPSS und AMOS vorgenommen. Im ersten Schritt wurde eine explorative Faktorenanalyse mit schiefwinkliger Rotation berechnet. Zur Reliabilit&#228;tsanalyse wurde Cronbach&#8217;s &#945; f&#252;r jeden Faktor ermittelt. Um eine angemessene interne Konsistenz zu gew&#228;hrleisten, war eine Item-Reduktion beider Subskalen erforderlich. Die Faktorenstruktur wurde mittels konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse f&#252;r die reduzierten Subskalen als auch f&#252;r die originalen Subskalen  gepr&#252;ft. Die Ergebnisse der beiden konfirmatorischen Faktorenanalysen wurden basierend auf folgenden Modellg&#252;te-Indizes verglichen: minimale Diskrepanz geteilt durch Freiheitsgrade (CMIN&#47;DF); Anpassungsg&#252;te (goodness-of-fit-index (GFI)); normierter Anpassungs-Index (normed-fit-index (NFI)); komparativer Anpassungs-Index (comparative-fit-index (CFI)); Tucker-Lewis-Index (TLI); absoluter Fit-Index (the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)) und Akaike Informationskriterium (Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)). Das Verh&#228;ltnis CMIN&#47;DF sollte f&#252;r eine zufriedenstellende Modellg&#252;te m&#246;glichst klein sein <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>. GFI sollte zwischen 0,97 und 1 liegen und NFI ist idealerweise gr&#246;&#223;er als 0,95 <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>. Eine geeignete Modellg&#252;te wird durch CFI- und TLI-Werte nahe 0,95 oder sogar h&#246;her angezeigt <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="40"></TextLink>. RMSEA sollte 0,05 oder kleiner sein. AIC z&#228;hlt zu den Badness of Fit-Indizes und gilt als deskriptiver Indikator. AIC erm&#246;glicht Vergleiche zwischen zwei unterschiedlichen Modellen, wobei der niedrigere AIC-Wert dem zu bevorzugendem Modell angeh&#246;rt <TextLink reference="38"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="39"></TextLink>. Um die Modelle zu testen, haben wir Kovarianzmatrizen und die Maximum-Likelihood-Methode eingesetzt. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Einstellungswerte wurden berechnet, indem die Summe der Likert-Werte jeder Subskala durch die Item-Anzahl pro Subskala geteilt wurde. Korrelationen zwischen den Einstellungswerten und demografischen Daten wurden mit dem Pearson-Korrelationskoeffizienten untersucht. Zur Pr&#252;fung auf Normalverteilung verwendeten wir den Kolmogorow-Smirnow-Test. Bei fehlender Normalverteilung wurde der nicht-parametrische Kruskal-Wallis-H-Test f&#252;r den Vergleich der CSAS-Ergebnisse verschiedener Studienjahre genutzt. Dieser ergab signifikante Rangunterschiede. Wir betrachteten somit die Nutzung eines parametrischen Verfahrens trotz fehlender Normalverteilung als gerechtfertigt. Zum Vergleich der Einstellungswerte nach Geschlecht haben wir T-Tests durchgef&#252;hrt. Die Vergleiche nach Studienjahr  wurden &#252;ber einfaktorielle Varianzanalyse mit post-hoc Scheff&#233;-Test vorgenommen. Um Gruppenunterschiede zu ermitteln, wurden die folgenden Signifikanzniveaus angewandt: &#42;p&#60;0,05, &#42;&#42;p&#60;0,01 und &#42;&#42;&#42;p&#60;0,001. Da die Subkohorten in ihrer Gr&#246;&#223;e variierten, wurden die Effektgr&#246;&#223;en (d) f&#252;r signifikante Mittelwerts-Differenzen  berechnet. Effektgr&#246;&#223;en von d&#62;0,50 werden als gro&#223; interpretiert, 0,50&#62;d&#62;0,30 als moderat, 0,30&#62;d&#62;0,10 als klein und d&#60;0,10 als belanglos <TextLink reference="41"></TextLink>.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Results">
      <MainHeadline>Results</MainHeadline><SubHeadline2>Demographic results</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>529 questionnaires have been completed satisfactorily. The subjects&#180; age ranged from 19 to 47 years (mean age&#61; 26 years). Female participants build the majority in the sample (64&#37;) in comparison to male participants (36&#37;) (see table 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="table"/>). The gender distribution of this cohort corresponds to the predominantly female fraction of medical students in Germany <TextLink reference="42"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Validation of CSAS-G</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure was 0.899 and a positive p-value of &#60;0.001 was revealed by Bartlett&#180;s test of sphericity, both results showing the adequacy for conducting factor analysis. The initial explorative factor analysis showed seven factors with eigenvalues larger than 1, explaining 58&#37; of variance. The original validation <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink> offered a two-factor solution with 13 items per subscale. We tried to replicate this in a second explorative factor analysis with determination of two factors. The derived factors were not identical to those in their study. Nevertheless, we decided to follow the two subscales&#180; system because of the qualitative basement provided by Rees and colleagues <TextLink reference="43"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>. Items were assigned to one factor, if they load at least 0.28 on one factor (see table 4 <ImgLink imgNo="4" imgType="table"/>). Items 01, 03, 08, 13, 18, 20 and 22 were excluded due to minimal or ambiguous loading on one factor. As a result the subscale NAS in our sample contains 7 items (Cronbach&#180;s &#945;&#61;0.838) and the subscale PAS consists of 12 items (Cronbach&#180;s &#945;&#61;0.864). The Pearson correlation coefficient for PAS score and NAS score in the total study sample is r&#61;-0.49 (p&#60;0.001) indicating a converse linear relationship between PAS score and NAS score which supports the founding idea of the original subscale structure: a low PAS score is associated with a high NAS score and reversely. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Subsequently we calculated the confirmatory factor analysis. The results for the original subscales were less satisfactory. The model for the CSAS-G was estimated in a second step. The reduced subscale structure was adopted from the results of the second explorative factor analysis. We found an insufficient model fit. Therefore we gradually allowed correlations between single item-influencing error indices by considering the respectively highest modification indices. As a result an assumable model was won. Therefore we consider our two factor model of explorative factor analysis as confirmed. Consequently we used the CSAS-G subscales as described in our explorative factor analysis for further calculations.</Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Attitudinal scores </SubHeadline2><Pgraph>The attitudinal scores of both subscales in relation to year of study are presented in table 5 <ImgLink imgNo="5" imgType="table"/>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Negative attitudes towards communication skills slightly increase from year 1 to year 2. Negative attitudes are more pronounced in year 4 in comparison to year 1. There was a significant difference between year 2 and year 4. With regard to mean scores measured along the PAS subscale, a significant reduction in positive attitude levels occurs from year 1 to year 2, followed by rising levels from year 2 to year 4. </Pgraph><Pgraph>In the complete study sample female students show lower NAS scores than male students (mean&#61;2.32) (p&#61;0.000; d&#61;0.48) and higher PAS scores (mean&#61;3.12) than male students (mean&#61;2.80) (p&#61;0.000; d&#61;0.38). Calculating the correlation coefficients for age and subscale scores identified no clear correlation (PAS score&#47;age: r&#61;-0.49 (p&#61;0.43); NAS score&#47;age: r&#61;0.09 (p&#60;0.05)). With respect to gender a correlation was deducted (PAS score&#47;gender: r&#61;0.21 (p&#60;0.001); NAS score&#47;gender: r&#61;-0.21 (p&#60;0.001)). </Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Regression analysis</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>Multiple regression (see table 6 <ImgLink imgNo="6" imgType="table"/>) was conducted progressively. In the first step a low significance for age is detected referring to the NAS score. However, in the second step adding gender, the significance of age is cancelled whereas the impact of gender on NAS and PAS score is highly significant. We repeated the procedure using year of study instead of age without finding significant different results. As consequence regression analysis reveals that gender has some bearing on CSAS scores. In general, the contribution of the regression analysis is limited as indicated by R&#178;&#61;0.044&#47;0.041.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Ergebnisse">
      <MainHeadline>Ergebnisse</MainHeadline><SubHeadline2>Demografische Kohortenbeschreibung</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>529 Frageb&#246;gen wurden vollst&#228;ndig ausgef&#252;llt. Die Altersrange der Befragten reichte von 19 bis 47 Jahren (Durchschnittsalter &#61; 26 Jahre). Weibliche Teilnehmer bildeten die Mehrheit (64&#37;) gegen&#252;ber den m&#228;nnlichen Teilnehmern (36&#37;) (siehe Tabelle 3 <ImgLink imgNo="3" imgType="table"/>). Die Geschlechterverteilung dieser Kohorte entspricht dem dominierenden Anteil weiblicher Studierender der Humanmedizin in Deutschland <TextLink reference="42"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Validierung der CSAS-G</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>Die Messung des Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin-Kriteriums ergab einen Wert von 0,899. Die Signifikanz nach Bartlett lieferte einen positiven p-Wert von &#60;0,001. Beide Ergebnisse belegen die Stichprobeneignung zur Durchf&#252;hrung einer explorativen Faktorenanalyse (EFA). Die initial durchgef&#252;hrte Faktorenanalyse ergab sieben Faktoren mit Eigenwerten gr&#246;&#223;er 1, die 58&#37; der Varianz erkl&#228;rten. Da eine inhaltliche Grundlage zur Annahme der siebenfaktoriellen L&#246;sung fehlte, wurden in einer zweiten EFA zwei Faktoren vorgegeben. Diese Vorgehensweise gr&#252;ndet auf der Original-Faktorenl&#246;sung nach Rees <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>. Erneut konnten die beiden Original-Item-B&#252;ndel nicht reproduziert werden. Dennoch entschieden wir uns auf Grund des von Rees und Kolleginnen vorgelegten, qualitativen Fundaments <TextLink reference="43"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="44"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink> zur Beibehaltung des zweifaktoriellen Systems. Die Faktorenzuordnung wurde ab einer Ladung von mindestens 0,28 auf einen Faktor zugelassen (siehe Tabelle 4 <ImgLink imgNo="4" imgType="table"/>). Die Items 01, 03, 08, 13, 18, 20 und 22 wurden wegen unzureichender oder uneindeutiger Faktorenladung eliminiert. Daraus folgt, dass die NAS-Subskala in unserer Stichprobe sieben Items beinhaltet (Cronbach&#180;s &#945;&#61; 0,838) und die PAS-Subskala zw&#246;lf Items (Cronbach&#180;s &#945;&#61; 0,864). Der Pearson-Korrelationskoeffizient f&#252;r die PAS- und NAS-Werte f&#228;llt unter Ber&#252;cksichtigung der Gesamtkohorte negativ aus (r&#61; -0,49 (p&#60;0.001)). Somit wird ein nicht- linearer Zusammenhang zwischen den beiden Subskalen angenommen: ein niedriger PAS-Wert ist verbunden mit einem hohen NAS-Wert im Sinne einer negativ gef&#228;rbten Einstellung und umgekehrt. Diese Konstellation entspricht der inhaltlichen Ausrichtung des CSAS-Originals. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Anschlie&#223;end haben wir die konfirmatorischen Faktorenanalysen berechnet. Im ersten Schritt untersuchten wir die originalen Subskalen, im zweiten das Modell der CSAS-G nach Item-Elimination. Die Werte f&#252;r die Originalstruktur waren im Vergleich weniger zufriedenstellend, woraufhin das CSAS-G System weiter untersucht wurde. Um eine annehmbare Modellg&#252;te der CSAS-G zu erreichen, duldeten wir  schrittweise Korrelationen zwischen einzelnen Item-bezogenen Fehlerindizes unter Ber&#252;cksichtigung m&#246;glichst hoher Modifikationsindizes. Unter diesen Bedingungen wurde die zweifaktorielle L&#246;sung der CSAS-G best&#228;tigt und konnte f&#252;r weitere Berechnungen verwendet werden. </Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Einstellungswerte</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>Die Einstellungsauspr&#228;gungen entlang beider Subskalen sind in Tabelle 5 <ImgLink imgNo="5" imgType="table"/> nach Studienjahr getrennt dargestellt.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Negative Einstellungen zu kommunikativer Kompetenz steigen vom ersten &#252;ber das zweite zum vierten Studienjahr leicht an. Als signifikant erwies sich die NAS-Mittelwerts-Differenz zwischen den Studienjahren zwei und vier. Die Mittelwerte der PAS-Subskala sinken signifikant vom ersten zum zweiten Studienjahr ab, gefolgt von ansteigenden Werten vom zweiten zum vierten Studienjahr. In der Gesamtkohorte zeigen weibliche Studierende signifikant niedrigere NAS-Werte (Mittelwert NAS&#61;2,05) als m&#228;nnliche Studierende (Mittelwert NAS&#61;2,32) (p&#61;0.000; d&#61;0,48). Gleichzeitig stimmen weibliche Studierende positiven Aussagen st&#228;rker zu (Mittelwert PAS&#61;3,12) als  ihre Kommilitonen (Mittelwert PAS&#61;2,80) (p&#61;0,000; d&#61;0,38). Zus&#228;tzlich konnte ein signifikanter Zusammenhang zwischen Geschlecht und Einstellungsauspr&#228;gung an Hand des Korrelationskoeffizientens belegt werden (PAS-Wert&#47;Geschlecht: r&#61;0,21; p&#60;0,001; NAS-Wert&#47;Geschlecht: r&#61;-0,21; p&#60;0,001). F&#252;r das Merkmal Alter geling dies nicht (PAS-Wert&#47;Alter: r&#61;-0,49; p&#61;0,43; NAS Wert&#47;Alter: r&#61;0,09; p&#60;0,05). </Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Regressionsanalyse</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>Eine multiple Regression (siehe Tabelle 6 <ImgLink imgNo="6" imgType="table"/>) wurde schrittweise durchgef&#252;hrt. Im ersten Schritt zeigte sich das Merkmal Alter von geringer Signifikanz in Bezug auf den NAS-Wert. Bei Ber&#252;cksichtigung des Geschlechts verlor Alter an Bedeutung, wohingegen der Einfluss des Geschlechts auf die NAS- und PAS-Werte hoch signifikant erschien. Wir wiederholten das Verfahren mit dem Merkmal Studienjahr statt Alter. Dabei fanden wir keine relevant abweichenden Ergebnisse. Folglich best&#228;tigt die Regressionsanalyse quantitativ den Einfluss des Geschlechts auf die CSAS-Subskalenwerte. Allerdings ist der Beitrag der Regressionsanalyse angesichts des geringen Determinationskoeffizientens AdjR&#178;&#61;0,044&#47;0,041 limitiert.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Discussion and conclusion">
      <MainHeadline>Discussion and conclusion</MainHeadline><SubHeadline2>Discussion </SubHeadline2><Pgraph>(1) First purpose of this study was to translate the English CSAS (CSAS-E) into German. In our study we used a forward-backward procedure for translation to win CSAS-G. Any translational procedure affects the study results. It is known that even slight changes in item wording influence understanding of interviewees and measurement <TextLink reference="46"></TextLink>. The potential impact of translation is magnified by the modifications of wording for study year 1 (see Procedure), which therefore presents a study limitation. In our case we consider adaption of wording as necessary to raise the understanding for study participants of study year 1. Despite the translation-related effects the original CSAS contains wordings that stand in contrast to general recommendations for questionnaire construction. Items should be phrased without suggestion or negation for best possible interviewee understanding <TextLink reference="47"></TextLink>. CSAS wordings like &#180;Communication skills teaching would have a better image if it sounded more like a science subject.&#180; (Item 17) or &#180;I don&#180;t need good communication skills to be a doctor.&#180; (Item 19) can reduce survey participants&#180; understanding.</Pgraph><Pgraph>(2) Second aim of this survey was to validate the CSAS-G. The two subscales of the CSAS-G are reliable after elimination of seven items. Confirmatory analysis approved this subscale system. To reach a satisfactory model fit stepwise modification was necessary. This fact points out a limited validity of the questionnaire. A validity check of good quality was not feasible due to missing German-speaking instruments that cover medical students&#180; attitudes towards communication skills.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Rees and colleagues <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink> initially describe a six-factor solution but decided to stick to a two-subscale system. In multiple validations this two-factor structure was confirmed, even though in some cases different items were assigned to the two subscales. Three other studies clearly describe elimination of items <TextLink reference="48"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink>. Items that have been eliminated repeatedly in several studies were not identified. Beside the two-factor solution of the CSAS-E, other subscale systems were developed (see table 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>). The factor solution for our sample does not replicate any of the other subscale structures described in research literature. </Pgraph><Pgraph>The variety of validation results can be ascribed to translation. Considering the different cultures and languages various factor-models can be evaluated as acceptable. Similar findings are known from other questionnaires that have been translated. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Another possible reason for varying CSAS factor solutions can be seen in selection of interviewees. Whereas the original CSAS was designed for medical undergraduates, research literature presents studies with psychology students <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, dental students <TextLink reference="51"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="52"></TextLink>, teachers <TextLink reference="53"></TextLink>, dietetic students <TextLink reference="54"></TextLink> and nursing students <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink>. In view of known factor analytic difficulties and critical item wordings some authors deduce a need for a modification of the original CSAS <TextLink reference="48"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>(3) The third aim of our study was to explore the attitudinal scores of medical undergraduates towards communication. Our results show low levels of negative attitudes and moderate levels of positive attitudes. We conclude that students in our cohort like communication therefore. In our study voluntary participation could mean that surveyed students are generally more interested in communication. Comparison of mean scores and year of study in our cohort conveys the following picture: the NAS scores increase significantly and PAS scores decrease. According to significant mean differences illustrating a negative trend, one may subsume a decline of attitude towards communication skills in conclusion. With regard to absolute means and their development, it is questionable whether this decline truly impacts attitudes. No influential change along the Likert-scale can be found with PAS means around a score of 3 and NAS means around 2. In our study findings no evidence of a decline of practical implication value is present <TextLink reference="55"></TextLink>. Research literature offers only single other works that show similar results <TextLink reference="56"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="57"></TextLink>. These conclusions with regard to attitudinal development have only limited expressiveness because of the cross-sectional study design. To truly measure the course of attitudes during medical school a longitudinal survey is indispensable. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Another limitation is given by the unequal sample sizes per study year. The majority of the cohort is built by year 2 students. To avoid sample size-related bias we calculated additionally the effect sizes which confirmed the significant mean differences.  </Pgraph><Pgraph>As known from another CSAS study women show more favorable attitudes <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>. This tendency is also present in our study findings. Two Asian CSAS studies reveal no significant differences between female and male attitude scores <TextLink reference="58"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="59"></TextLink>. An alternative study result was found in a UK cohort where an increase in male empathy scores in contrast to decreasing female scores was detected <TextLink reference="60"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Conclusion and practice implication</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>In medical education exists sustained interest in attitudinal research. The CSAS is a helpful instrument to evaluate students&#180; attitudes towards communication skills. Translation delivered the CSAS-G which proved to be reliable in our pilot study. In principle CSAS-G is suitable for German-speaking medical education purposes. Under certain circumstances rephrasing of specific items is recommended for closer adaption to the respective study object. Beside the use of the translated CSAS version, no accompanying qualitative evaluation of the students&#180; views towards communication skills learning has been conducted. In order to develop a German version considering special thoughts of German students, further research will be beneficial <TextLink reference="61"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>We saw difficulties in factor analytic verification that are already known from other CSAS-studies, even from the original validation of CSAS-E. Up to now a study comparing the different factor-models is missing. Further studies are necessary to examine validity and test-retest-reliability. So far it is questionable whether the construction of negative and positive attitudes towards communication skills aligns reality.</Pgraph><Pgraph>The students in our study seem to like communication. For a deeper understanding of attitude development future research including a longitudinal design is necessary. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Diskussion und Schlussfolgerung">
      <MainHeadline>Diskussion und Schlussfolgerung</MainHeadline><SubHeadline2>Diskussion</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>(1) Das erste Ziel dieser Forschungsarbeit war die &#220;bersetzung der englischsprachigen CSAS ins Deutsche. Dazu nutzten wir das etablierte Vorw&#228;rts-R&#252;ckw&#228;rts-Verfahren. Grunds&#228;tzlich wirkt sich jeglicher &#220;bersetzungsvorgang auf die Studienergebnisse aus. Es ist bekannt, dass selbst geringf&#252;gige &#196;nderungen des Item-Wortlauts das Befragtenverst&#228;ndnis und die Messung beeinflussen <TextLink reference="46"></TextLink>. In unserer Studie wurde der potenzielle Einfluss der &#220;bersetzung verst&#228;rkt durch die Item-Modifikationen f&#252;r das erste Studienjahr (siehe 2.2.1 Durchf&#252;hrung), welche eine methodische Schw&#228;che bedeuten. Dennoch verstehen wir die Anpassung einzelner Item-Formulierungen als unverzichtbar f&#252;r das Verst&#228;ndnis der Teilnehmer aus dem ersten Studienjahr. Unabh&#228;ngig davon enth&#228;lt die originale CSAS Item-Formulierungen, die allgemeinen Empfehlungen zur Fragebogenkonstruktion nicht gerecht werden. So sollten Items f&#252;r ein bestm&#246;gliches Verst&#228;ndnis nicht suggestiv oder verneinend formuliert sein <TextLink reference="47"></TextLink>. Entsprechend verwirrend f&#252;r den Befragten k&#246;nnen manche Formulierungen der CSAS wirken wie Item 17: &#8220;Der Gespr&#228;chsf&#252;hrungskurs w&#228;re angesehener, wenn er naturwissenschaftlicher w&#228;re.&#8220; (&#180;Communication skills teaching would have a better image if it sounded more like a science subject.&#180;) oder Item 19: &#8220;Ich brauche keine gute Gespr&#228;chsf&#252;hrung, um ein guter Arzt zu sein.&#8220; (&#180;I don&#180;t need good communication skills to be a doctor.&#180;).</Pgraph><Pgraph>(2) Das zweite Ziel dieser Studie war die Validierung der CSAS-G. Nach Item-Elimination boten die beiden Subskalen eine moderate Reliabilit&#228;t. Die konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse best&#228;tigt erst nach stufenweiser Anpassung die hinreichende Modellg&#252;te der zweifaktoriellen L&#246;sung. Dieser Umstand schr&#228;nkt die Validit&#228;t der CSAS-G ein. Eine umfassende Validierung mittels Au&#223;enkriterium war zu diesem Zeitpunkt nicht m&#246;glich, da &#228;hnlich gelagerte Frageb&#246;gen in deutscher Sprache fehlen. </Pgraph><Pgraph>In der Originalarbeit zur Entwicklung der CSAS entdeckten Rees und Kolleginnen zuerst eine sechsteilige Faktorenstruktur, verfolgten jedoch das System mit zwei Subskalen <TextLink reference="20"></TextLink>. Mehrere Validierungen konnten diese Faktorenl&#246;sung best&#228;tigen, wenngleich in einigen F&#228;llen den zwei Subskalen unterschiedliche Items zugeordnet wurden. Drei andere Studien neben unserer Arbeit weisen auf notwendige Item-Eliminationen hin <TextLink reference="48"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="49"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink>. Dabei variierten die entfernten Items. Neben der zweifaktoriellen L&#246;sung wurden weitere Subskalensysteme entwickelt (siehe Tabelle 1 <ImgLink imgNo="1" imgType="table"/>). Die Faktorenstruktur unserer Stichprobe weicht ab von allen bereits in der CSAS-Forschungsliteratur beschriebenen Subskalen. In Anbetracht der strukturellen Schwierigkeiten und teils ung&#252;nstiger Item-Formulierungen schlie&#223;en manche Autoren auf die Notwendigkeit einer generellen CSAS-Modifikation <TextLink reference="48"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink>.</Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Vielfalt der CSAS-Validierungsergebnisse kann zum Teil als Folge der &#220;bersetzungen gesehen werden. In Anbetracht der unterschiedlichen Kulturen und Sprachen k&#246;nnen verschiedene Faktorenl&#246;sungen eines Forschungsinstruments als annehmbar bewertet werden. Ein &#228;hnliches Bild findet sich bei anderen Frageb&#246;gen, die &#252;bersetzt wurden. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Die unkritische Auswahl der Befragten kann eine weitere m&#246;gliche Ursache f&#252;r variierende CSAS-Subskalen sein. W&#228;hrend die CSAS urspr&#252;nglich f&#252;r Medizinstudierende konzipiert wurde, offeriert die Literatur auch Befragungen von Studierenden der Psychologie <TextLink reference="25"></TextLink>, Zahnmedizin <TextLink reference="51"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="52"></TextLink> und Ern&#228;hrungswissenschaften <TextLink reference="53"></TextLink>, sowie Lehrern <TextLink reference="54"></TextLink> und Krankenpflegepersonal in  Ausbildung <TextLink reference="50"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><Pgraph>(3) Das dritte Ziel dieser Studie war die Untersuchung der Einstellungsauspr&#228;gungen Leipziger Medizinstudierender. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen niedrige Werte bei den negativen Einstellungen und moderate Werte bei den positiven Einstellungen. Wir schlussfolgern daher, dass Studierende unserer Kohorte das Erlernen von Gespr&#228;chskompetenz m&#246;gen. Die freiwillige Teilnahme an unserer Studie kann bedeuten, dass die Befragten grunds&#228;tzlich mehr Interesse an Kommunikation haben. Der Vergleich der Mittelwerte nach Studienjahr ergibt in unserer Stichprobe folgenden Verlauf: die NAS-Werte steigen signifikant an und die PAS-Werte sinken. Ein allein von signifikanten Mittelwerts-Differenzen abgeleiteter Trend entspr&#228;che einer im Ausbildungsverlauf negativen Einstellungsentwicklung. Bei der Betrachtung der absoluten Mittelwerte ist es jedoch fraglich, ob dieses geringf&#252;gige Ver&#228;nderungsma&#223; die Einstellungen wirklich beeinflusst. Abgebildet auf der Likert-Skala liegen alle PAS-Mittelwerte bei Stufe drei und alle NAS-Mittelwerte bei Stufe zwei. Demzufolge liefern unsere Studienergebnisse keine Anhaltspunkte f&#252;r einen ung&#252;nstigen Einstellungsverlauf von praktischer Relevanz <TextLink reference="55"></TextLink>. In der Forschungsliteratur finden sich nur einzelne andere Arbeiten, die &#228;hnliche Ergebnisse vorlegen <TextLink reference="56"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="57"></TextLink>. Die Schlussfolgerungen zur Einstellungsentwicklung in der Leipziger Kohorte haben aufgrund des Querschnittsdesigns nur eingeschr&#228;nkte Aussagekraft. Zur zuverl&#228;ssigen Erfassung des Einstellungsverlaufs w&#228;hrend des Medizinstudiums, ist eine L&#228;ngsschnittstudie unabdingbar. Eine weitere methodische Schw&#228;che ist durch die ungleichen Subkohorten-Gr&#246;&#223;en gegeben. Die Mehrheit der Studierenden stammt aus dem zweiten Studienjahr. Um eine Verzerrung vor diesem Hintergrund zu vermeiden, haben wir zus&#228;tzlich die Effektst&#228;rken berechnet. Diese haben die signifikanten Mittelwerts-Differenzen best&#228;tigt. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Wie eine andere CSAS-Studie beweist, geben weibliche Befragte w&#252;nschenswertere  Einstellungen an <TextLink reference="45"></TextLink>. Diese Tendenz spiegelt sich in unseren Ergebnissen wider. Demgegen&#252;ber ergaben zwei CSAS-Studien aus dem asiatischen Raum keinen signifikanten Einfluss der Geschlechtszugeh&#246;rigkeit auf die Einstellungsauspr&#228;gung <TextLink reference="58"></TextLink>, <TextLink reference="59"></TextLink>. Ein g&#228;nzlich anderes Bild zeigt eine Studie aus Gro&#223;britannien, die wachsende Empathie bei m&#228;nnlichen Befragten bei gleichzeitig sinkender Empathie  der Teilnehmerinnen belegte <TextLink reference="60"></TextLink>. </Pgraph><SubHeadline2>Schlussfolgerung und Praxisbezug</SubHeadline2><Pgraph>In der &#228;rztlichen Ausbildung besteht anhaltendes Interesse an Einstellungsforschung. Die CSAS ist ein hilfreiches Instrument zur Erfassung der Einstellungen Studierender zu Gespr&#228;chskompetenz. Die &#220;bersetzung lieferte die CSAS-G, die sich in unserer Pilotstudie als reliabel erwies. Prinzipiell kann die CSAS-G f&#252;r zuk&#252;nftige Forschung an deutschsprachigen Medizinfakult&#228;ten eingesetzt werden. Wir empfehlen  abzuw&#228;gen, ob die Umformulierung einzelner Items notwendig ist. In unserer Erhebung verzichteten wir auf eine begleitende qualitative Einstellungserfassung. F&#252;r die Entwicklung einer deutschsprachigen CSAS- Version, die spezifische Einstellungen deutschsprachiger Medizinstudierender ber&#252;cksichtigt, w&#228;re weitere Forschung zutr&#228;glich <TextLink reference="61"></TextLink>. Wie aus vorhergehenden CSAS-Studien inklusive der Original-Validierung bekannt ist, stellten auch wir Schwierigkeiten bei der Faktorenbildung fest. Bisher fehlen vergleichende Untersuchungen der verschiedenen Faktorenmodelle. Es besteht zus&#228;tzlicher Forschungsbedarf, um Erkenntnisse zur Validit&#228;t und Retest-Reliabilit&#228;t zu gewinnen. Der aktuelle Untersuchungsstand zur CSAS l&#228;sst offen, ob die von Rees und Kolleginnen erarbeitete Konzeption negativer und positiver Einstellungen in dieser Form existiert. </Pgraph><Pgraph>Die Studierenden unserer Studie scheinen Kommunikation zu m&#246;gen. F&#252;r ein tieferes Verst&#228;ndnis von Einstellungsentwicklung sind weitere Forschungsarbeiten  einschlie&#223;lich L&#228;ngsschnittstudien, erforderlich.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Acknowledgements">
      <MainHeadline>Acknowledgements</MainHeadline><Pgraph>We thank our study participants. Thanks to Prof. Charlotte Rees for allowing and supporting us to translate the CSAS and Prof. Andreas Hinz for his revision suggestions. </Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Danksagung">
      <MainHeadline>Danksagung</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Wir danken unseren Studienteilnehmern. Danke an Frau Prof. Charlotte Rees f&#252;r die Erlaubnis zur und Unterst&#252;tzung bei der &#220;bersetzung der  CSAS. Unser Dank gilt auch Prof. Andreas Hinz f&#252;r seine Vorschl&#228;ge bei der &#220;berarbeitung.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="en" linked="yes" name="Competing interests">
      <MainHeadline>Competing interests</MainHeadline><Pgraph>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <TextBlock language="de" linked="yes" name="Interessenkonflikt">
      <MainHeadline>Interessenkonflikt</MainHeadline><Pgraph>Die Autoren erkl&#228;ren, dass sie keine Interessenkonflikte im Zusammenhang mit diesem Artikel haben.</Pgraph></TextBlock>
    <References linked="yes">
      <Reference refNo="1">
        <RefAuthor>Street RL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Makoul G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Arora NK</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Epstein RM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>How does communication heal&#63; Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Patient Educ Couns</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>295&#8211;301</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Street RL, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal&#63; Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):295&#8211;301. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.pec.2008.11.015</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.pec.2008.11.015</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="2">
        <RefAuthor>Kurtz SM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Silverman J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Draper J</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1998</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kurtz SM, Silverman J, Draper J. Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press; 1998.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="3">
        <RefAuthor>Kiessling C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dieterich A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fabry G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>H&#246;lzer H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Langewitz W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>M&#252;hlinghaus I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Pruskil S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Scheffer S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Schubert S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Basel Consensus Statement &#34;Communicative and Social Competencies in Medical Education&#34;: A Position Paper of the GMA Committee Communicative and Social Competencies</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>GMS Z Med Ausbild</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>Doc83</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Kiessling C, Dieterich A, Fabry G, H&#246;lzer H, Langewitz W, M&#252;hlinghaus I, Pruskil S, Scheffer S, Schubert S. Basel Consensus Statement &#34;Communicative and Social Competencies in Medical Education&#34;: A Position Paper of the GMA Committee Communicative and Social Competencies. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2008;25(2):Doc83. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: http:&#47;&#47;www.egms.de&#47;static&#47;de&#47;journals&#47;zma&#47;2008-25&#47;zma000567.shtml</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;www.egms.de&#47;static&#47;de&#47;journals&#47;zma&#47;2008-25&#47;zma000567.shtml</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="4">
        <RefAuthor>Hahn EG</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fischer MR</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>National Competence-Based Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) in Germany: Cooperation of the Association for Medical Education (GMA) and the Association of Medical Faculties in Germany (MFT)</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>GMS Z Med Ausbild</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>Doc35</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hahn EG, Fischer MR. National Competence-Based Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) in Germany: Cooperation of the Association for Medical Education (GMA) and the Association of Medical Faculties in Germany (MFT). GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2009;26(3):Doc35. Zug&#228;nglich unter&#47;available from: http:&#47;&#47;www.egms.de&#47;static&#47;de&#47;journals&#47;zma&#47;2009-26&#47;zma000627.shtml</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;www.egms.de&#47;static&#47;de&#47;journals&#47;zma&#47;2009-26&#47;zma000627.shtml</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="5">
        <RefAuthor>Fragstein M von</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Silverman J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Cushing A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Quilligan S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Salisbury H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wiskin C</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>UK consensus statement on the content of communication curricula in undergraduate medical education</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1100&#8211;1107</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Fragstein M von, Silverman J, Cushing A, Quilligan S, Salisbury H, Wiskin C. UK consensus statement on the content of communication curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2008;42(11):1100&#8211;1107. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.2008.03137.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.2008.03137.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="6">
        <RefAuthor>Dubois A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Patil V</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The status quo of modern medical professionalism</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Clin Teach</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>267&#8211;268</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dubois A, Patil V. The status quo of modern medical professionalism. Clin Teach. 2012;9(4):267&#8211;268. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1743-498X.2012.00608.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1743-498X.2012.00608.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="7">
        <RefAuthor>Ajzen I</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Nature and operation of attitudes</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Annu Rev Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>27&#8211;58</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ajzen I. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:27&#8211;58. DOI: 10.1146&#47;annurev.psych.52.1.27</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1146&#47;annurev.psych.52.1.27</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="8">
        <RefAuthor>Eagly AH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chaiken S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1993</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>The psychology of attitudes</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, Tex: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers; 1993.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="9">
        <RefAuthor>Fishbein M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ajzen I</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1975</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass. &#91;u.a.&#93;: Addison-Wesley; 1975.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="10">
        <RefAuthor>Bombeke K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Symons L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Debaene L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Winter B de</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Schol S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>van Royen P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Help, I&#39;m losing patient-centredness&#33; Experiences of medical students and their teachers</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>662&#8211;673</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bombeke K, Symons L, Debaene L, Winter B de, Schol S, van Royen P. Help, I&#39;m losing patient-centredness&#33; Experiences of medical students and their teachers. Med Educ. 2010;44(7):662&#8211;673. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.2010.03627.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.2010.03627.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="11">
        <RefAuthor>Levinson W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Roter D</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Physicians&#39; psychosocial beliefs correlate with their patient communication skills</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1995</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Gen Intern Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>375&#8211;379</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Levinson W, Roter D. Physicians&#39; psychosocial beliefs correlate with their patient communication skills. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(7):375&#8211;379. DOI: 10.1007&#47;BF02599834</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;BF02599834</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="12">
        <RefAuthor>Eron LD</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Effect of Medical Education on Students&#180; Attitudes</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1955</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>559&#8211;566</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Eron LD. Effect of Medical Education on Students&#180; Attitudes. Med Educ. 1955;10:559&#8211;566.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="13">
        <RefAuthor>Eron LD</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The Effect of Medical Education on Attitudes: A Follow-up Study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1958</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>25&#8211;33</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Eron LD. The Effect of Medical Education on Attitudes: A Follow-up Study. Med Educ. 1958;33:25&#8211;33.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="14">
        <RefAuthor>Neumann M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Edelh&#228;user F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tauschel D</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fischer MR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wirtz M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Woopen C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Haramati A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Scheffer C</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Acad Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>996&#8211;1009</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Neumann M, Edelh&#228;user F, Tauschel D, Fischer MR, Wirtz M, Woopen C, Haramati A, Scheffer C. Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Acad Med. 2011;86(8):996&#8211;1009. DOI: 10.1097&#47;ACM.0b013e318221e615</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;ACM.0b013e318221e615</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="15">
        <RefAuthor>Pedersen R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Empathy development in medical education--a critical review</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Teach</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>593&#8211;600</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Pedersen R. Empathy development in medical education--a critical review. Med Teach. 2010;32(7):593&#8211;600. DOI: 10.3109&#47;01421590903544702</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.3109&#47;01421590903544702</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="16">
        <RefAuthor>Tsimtsiou Z</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kerasidou O</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Efstathiou N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Papaharitou S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hatzimouratidis K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hatzichristou D</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Medical students&#39; attitudes toward patient-centred care: a longitudinal survey</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>146&#8211;153</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Tsimtsiou Z, Kerasidou O, Efstathiou N, Papaharitou S, Hatzimouratidis K, Hatzichristou D. Medical students&#39; attitudes toward patient-centred care: a longitudinal survey. Med Educ. 2007;41(2):146&#8211;153. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2929.2006.02668.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2929.2006.02668.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="17">
        <RefAuthor>Woloschuk W</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Harasym PH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Temple W</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Attitude change during medical school: a cohort study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>522&#8211;534</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Woloschuk W, Harasym PH, Temple W. Attitude change during medical school: a cohort study. Med Educ. 2004;38(5):522&#8211;534. DOI: 10.1046&#47;j.1365-2929.2004.01820.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1046&#47;j.1365-2929.2004.01820.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="18">
        <RefAuthor>Haidet P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dains JE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Paterniti DA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hechtel L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chang T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Tseng E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rogers JC</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Medical student attitudes toward the doctor-patient relationship</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>568&#8211;574</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Haidet P, Dains JE, Paterniti DA, Hechtel L, Chang T, Tseng E, Rogers JC. Medical student attitudes toward the doctor-patient relationship. Med Educ. 2002;36(6):568&#8211;574. DOI: 10.1046&#47;j.1365-2923.2002.01233.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1046&#47;j.1365-2923.2002.01233.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="19">
        <RefAuthor>Hojat M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vergare MJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Maxwell K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Brainard G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Herrine SK</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Isenberg GA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Veloski J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gonnella JS</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Acad Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1182&#8211;1191</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, Brainard G, Herrine SK, Isenberg GA, Veloski J, Gonnella JS. The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med. 2009;84(9):1182&#8211;1191. DOI: 10.1097&#47;ACM.0b013e3181b17e55</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;ACM.0b013e3181b17e55</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="20">
        <RefAuthor>Rees C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sheard C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Davies S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The development of a scale to measure medical students&#39; attitudes towards communication skills learning: the Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS)</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>141&#8211;147</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rees C, Sheard C, Davies S. The development of a scale to measure medical students&#39; attitudes towards communication skills learning: the Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS). Med Educ. 2002;36(2):141&#8211;147. DOI: 10.1046&#47;j.1365-2923.2002.01072.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1046&#47;j.1365-2923.2002.01072.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="21">
        <RefAuthor>T&#243;th I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>B&#225;n I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>F&#252;zesi Z</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Keszty&#252;s M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Nagy L</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Els&#246; &#233;vfolyamos orvostanhallgat&#243;k attit&#252;djei az orvosi kommunik&#225;ci&#243; oktat&#225;s&#225;val kapcsolatban</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Orv Hetil</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1535&#8211;1543</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>T&#243;th I, B&#225;n I, F&#252;zesi Z, Keszty&#252;s M, Nagy L. Els&#246; &#233;vfolyamos orvostanhallgat&#243;k attit&#252;djei az orvosi kommunik&#225;ci&#243; oktat&#225;s&#225;val kapcsolatban. Orv Hetil. 2011;152(38):1535&#8211;1543. DOI: 10.1556&#47;OH.2011.29185</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1556&#47;OH.2011.29185</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="22">
        <RefAuthor>Rees C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sheard C</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Evaluating first-year medical students&#39; attitudes to learning communication skills before and after a communication skills course</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2003</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Teach</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>302&#8211;307</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rees C, Sheard C. Evaluating first-year medical students&#39; attitudes to learning communication skills before and after a communication skills course. Med Teach. 2003;25(3):302&#8211;307. DOI: 10.1080&#47;0142159031000100409</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;0142159031000100409</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="23">
        <RefAuthor>Harlak H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gemalmaz A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gurel FS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dereboy C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ertekin K</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Communication skills training: effects on attitudes toward communication skills and empathic tendency</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Educ Health (Abingdon)</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>62</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Harlak H, Gemalmaz A, Gurel FS, Dereboy C, Ertekin K. Communication skills training: effects on attitudes toward communication skills and empathic tendency. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2008;21(2):62.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="24">
        <RefAuthor>Bombeke K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Van Roosbroeck S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Winter B de</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Debaene L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Schol S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Van Hal G</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Van Royen P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Medical students trained in communication skills show a decline in patient-centred attitudes: an observational study comparing two cohorts during clinical clerkships</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Patient Educ Couns</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>310&#8211;318</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bombeke K, Van Roosbroeck S, Winter B de, Debaene L, Schol S, Van Hal G, Van Royen P. Medical students trained in communication skills show a decline in patient-centred attitudes: an observational study comparing two cohorts during clinical clerkships. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(3):310&#8211;318. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.pec.2011.03.007</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.pec.2011.03.007</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="25">
        <RefAuthor>Tiuraniemi J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>L&#228;&#228;r&#228; R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Kyr&#246; T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lindeman S</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Medical and psychology students&#39; self-assessed communication skills: A pilot study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Patient Educ Couns</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>152&#8211;157</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Tiuraniemi J, L&#228;&#228;r&#228; R, Kyr&#246; T, Lindeman S. Medical and psychology students&#39; self-assessed communication skills: A pilot study. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;83(2):152&#8211;157. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.pec.2010.05.013</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.pec.2010.05.013</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="26">
        <RefAuthor>Koponen J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Py&#246;r&#228;l&#228; E</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Isotalus P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Comparing three experiential learning methods and their effect on medical students&#39; attitudes to learning communication skills</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Teach</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>e198-207</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Koponen J, Py&#246;r&#228;l&#228; E, Isotalus P. Comparing three experiential learning methods and their effect on medical students&#39; attitudes to learning communication skills. Med Teach. 2012;34(3):e198-207. DOI: 10.3109&#47;0142159X.2012.642828</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.3109&#47;0142159X.2012.642828</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="27">
        <RefAuthor>Harlak H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dereboy C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gemalmaz A</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Validation of a Turkish translation of the Communication Skills Attitude Scale with Turkish medical students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Educ Health (Abingdon)</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>55</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Harlak H, Dereboy C, Gemalmaz A. Validation of a Turkish translation of the Communication Skills Attitude Scale with Turkish medical students. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2008;21(1):55.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="28">
        <RefAuthor>Fazel I</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Aghamolaei T</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Attitudes toward learning communication skills among medical students of a university in Iran</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Acta Med Iran</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>625&#8211;629</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Fazel I, Aghamolaei T. Attitudes toward learning communication skills among medical students of a university in Iran. Acta Med Iran. 2011;49(9):625&#8211;629.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="29">
        <RefAuthor>Cleland J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Foster K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Moffat M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Undergraduate students&#39; attitudes to communication skills learning differ depending on year of study and gender</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2005</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Teach</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>246&#8211;251</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Cleland J, Foster K, Moffat M. Undergraduate students&#39; attitudes to communication skills learning differ depending on year of study and gender. Med Teach. 2005;27(3):246&#8211;251. DOI: 10.1080&#47;01421590400029541</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;01421590400029541</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="30">
        <RefAuthor>Khashab SS</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Attitudes of Alexandria Medical Students towards Communication Skills Learning</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Egypt Public Health Assoc</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>355&#8211;372</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Khashab SS. Attitudes of Alexandria Medical Students towards Communication Skills Learning. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2006;81(5-6):355&#8211;372.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="31">
        <RefAuthor>Anvik T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Grimstad H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Baerheim A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bernt Fasmer O</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gude T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hjortdahl P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Holen A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Risberg T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vaglum P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Medical students&#39; cognitive and affective attitudes towards learning and using communication skills--a nationwide cross-sectional study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2008</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Teach</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>272&#8211;279</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Anvik T, Grimstad H, Baerheim A, Bernt Fasmer O, Gude T, Hjortdahl P, Holen A, Risberg T, Vaglum P. Medical students&#39; cognitive and affective attitudes towards learning and using communication skills--a nationwide cross-sectional study. Med Teach. 2008;30(3):272&#8211;279. DOI: 10.1080&#47;01421590701784356</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;01421590701784356</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="32">
        <RefAuthor>Quince TA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Parker RA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Wood DF</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Benson JA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Stability of empathy among undergraduate medical students: a longitudinal study at one UK medical school</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMC Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>90</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Quince TA, Parker RA, Wood DF, Benson JA. Stability of empathy among undergraduate medical students: a longitudinal study at one UK medical school. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:90. DOI: 10.1186&#47;1472-6920-11-90</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1186&#47;1472-6920-11-90</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="33">
        <RefAuthor>Loureiro EM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Severo M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bettencourt P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ferreira MA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Attitudes and anxiety levels of medical students towards the acquisition of competencies in communication skills</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Patient Educ Couns</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>e272-e277</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Loureiro EM, Severo M, Bettencourt P, Ferreira MA. Attitudes and anxiety levels of medical students towards the acquisition of competencies in communication skills. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(3):e272-e277. DOI: 10.1016&#47;j.pec.2011.07.005</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;j.pec.2011.07.005</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="34">
        <RefAuthor>Rogers CR</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Farson RE</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1957</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Active listening</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rogers CR, Farson RE. Active listening. Chicago: Industrial Relations Center, The University of Chicago; 1957.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="35">
        <RefAuthor>Rockenbauch K</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Medizindidaktik: G&#246;tz Fabry</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Z Med Psychol</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>102</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rockenbauch K. Medizindidaktik: G&#246;tz Fabry. Z Med Psychol. 2010;19:102.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="36">
        <RefAuthor>Rockenbauch K</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Kompetent kommunizieren in Klinik und Praxis</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rockenbauch K. Kompetent kommunizieren in Klinik und Praxis &#91;Feedbackregeln&#93;. Lengerich &#91;u.a.&#93;: Pabst Science Publ.; 2006.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="37">
        <RefAuthor>St&#246;bel-Richter Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rockenbauch K</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Feedbackregeln</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Kompetent kommunizieren in Klinik und Praxis; Feedbackregeln</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>241&#8211;62</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>St&#246;bel-Richter Y, Rockenbauch K. Feedbackregeln. In: Rockenbauch K (Hrsg). Kompetent kommunizieren in Klinik und Praxis; Feedbackregeln. Lengerich &#91;u.a.&#93;: Pabst Science Publ.; 2006. p.241&#8211;62 .</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="38">
        <RefAuthor>Arbuckle R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Clark M</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Harness J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bonner N</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Scott J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Draelos Z</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Rizer R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Yeh Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Copley-Merriman K</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Item reduction and psychometric validation of the Oily Skin Self Assessment Scale (OSSAS) and the Oily Skin Impact Scale (OSIS)</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Value Health</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>828&#8211;837</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Arbuckle R, Clark M, Harness J, Bonner N, Scott J, Draelos Z, Rizer R, Yeh Y, Copley-Merriman K. Item reduction and psychometric validation of the Oily Skin Self Assessment Scale (OSSAS) and the Oily Skin Impact Scale (OSIS). Value Health. 2009;12(5):828&#8211;837. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1524-4733.2009.00504.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1524-4733.2009.00504.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="39">
        <RefAuthor>Schermelleh-Engel K</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Moosbrugger H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>M&#252;ller H</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models:Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2003</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Meth Psychol Res Online</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>23&#8211;74</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, M&#252;ller H. Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models:Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Meth Psychol Res Online. 2003;8(2):23&#8211;74.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="40">
        <RefAuthor>Hu L</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bentler PM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hu L</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1998</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Psychol Method</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>424&#8211;453</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Hu L, Bentler PM, Hu L. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Method. 1998;3(4):424&#8211;453. DOI: 10.1037&#47;1082-989X.3.4.424</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1037&#47;1082-989X.3.4.424</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="41">
        <RefAuthor>Bortz J</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>D&#246;ring N</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation f&#252;r Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage>606</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Bortz J, D&#246;ring N. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation f&#252;r Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. S.606. DOI: 10.1007&#47;978-3-540-33306-7</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1007&#47;978-3-540-33306-7</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="42">
        <RefAuthor>DESTATIS Statistisches Bundesamt</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2014</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Bildung und Kulter: Studierende an Hochschulen - Vorbericht- Wintersemester 2013&#47;14</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>DESTATIS Statistisches Bundesamt. Bildung und Kulter: Studierende an Hochschulen - Vorbericht- Wintersemester 2013&#47;14. Wiesbaden: DESTATIS; 2014.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="43">
        <RefAuthor>Rees CE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Garrud P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Identifying undergraduate medical students&#39; attitudes towards communication skills learning: a pilot study</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2001</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Teach</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>400&#8211;406</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rees CE, Garrud P. Identifying undergraduate medical students&#39; attitudes towards communication skills learning: a pilot study. Med Teach. 2001;23(4):400&#8211;406. DOI: 10.1080&#47;01421590120057067</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1080&#47;01421590120057067</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="44">
        <RefAuthor>Rees C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sheard C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>McPherson A</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Communication skills assessment: the perceptions of medical students at the University of Nottingham</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>868&#8211;878</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rees C, Sheard C, McPherson A. Communication skills assessment: the perceptions of medical students at the University of Nottingham. Med Educ. 2002;36(9):868&#8211;878. DOI: 10.1046&#47;j.1365-2923.2002.01300.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1046&#47;j.1365-2923.2002.01300.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="45">
        <RefAuthor>Rees C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Sheard C</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>The relationship between medical students&#39; attitudes towards communication skills learning and their demographic and education-related characteristics</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2002</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1017&#8211;1027</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Rees C, Sheard C. The relationship between medical students&#39; attitudes towards communication skills learning and their demographic and education-related characteristics. Med Educ. 2002;36(11):1017&#8211;1027. DOI: 10.1046&#47;j.1365-2923.2002.01333.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1046&#47;j.1365-2923.2002.01333.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="46">
        <RefAuthor>Foddy WH</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1993</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaires: Theory and practice in social research</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Foddy WH. Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaires: Theory and practice in social research. Cambridge (UK), New York (USA): Cambridge University Press; 1993. DOI: 10.1017&#47;CBO9780511518201</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1017&#47;CBO9780511518201</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="47">
        <RefAuthor>B&#252;hner M</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle></RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2004</RefYear>
        <RefBookTitle>Einf&#252;hrung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion</RefBookTitle>
        <RefPage></RefPage>
        <RefTotal>B&#252;hner M. Einf&#252;hrung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. M&#252;nchen &#91;u.a.&#93;: Pearson Studium; 2004.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="48">
        <RefAuthor>Ahn S</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Yi Y</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ahn D</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Developing a Korean communication skills attitude scale: comparing attitudes between Korea and the West</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2009</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>246&#8211;253</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ahn S, Yi Y, Ahn D. Developing a Korean communication skills attitude scale: comparing attitudes between Korea and the West. Med Educ. 2009;43(3):246&#8211;253. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.2008.03271.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.2008.03271.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="49">
        <RefAuthor>Anvik T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Gude T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Grimstad H</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Baerheim A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Fasmer OB</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hjortdahl P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Holen A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Risberg T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Vaglum P</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Assessing medical students&#39; attitudes towards learning communication skills--which components of attitudes do we measure&#63;</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>BMC Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>4</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Anvik T, Gude T, Grimstad H, Baerheim A, Fasmer OB, Hjortdahl P, Holen A, Risberg T, Vaglum P. Assessing medical students&#39; attitudes towards learning communication skills--which components of attitudes do we measure&#63; BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:4. DOI: 10.1186&#47;1472-6920-7-4</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1186&#47;1472-6920-7-4</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="50">
        <RefAuthor>Molinuevo B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Torrubia R</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Validation of the Catalan version of the communication skills attitude scale (CSAS) in a cohort of south European medical and nursing students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Educ Health (Abingdon)</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>499</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Molinuevo B, Torrubia R. Validation of the Catalan version of the communication skills attitude scale (CSAS) in a cohort of south European medical and nursing students. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2011;24(1):499.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="51">
        <RefAuthor>Nor NA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Yusof ZY</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shahidan MN</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>University of Malaya dental students&#39; attitudes towards communication skills learning: implications for dental education</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2011</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Dent Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1611&#8211;1619</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Nor NA, Yusof ZY, Shahidan MN. University of Malaya dental students&#39; attitudes towards communication skills learning: implications for dental education. J Dent Educ. 2011;75(12):1611&#8211;1619.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="52">
        <RefAuthor>Laurence B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bertera EM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Feimster T</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Hollander R</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Stroman C</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Adaptation of the Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS) to dental students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Dent Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1629&#8211;1638</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Laurence B, Bertera EM, Feimster T, Hollander R, Stroman C. Adaptation of the Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS) to dental students. J Dent Educ. 2012;76(12):1629&#8211;1638.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="53">
        <RefAuthor>Ihmeideh FM</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Al-Omari AA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Al-Dababneh KA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Attituders toward Communication Skills among Students&#39;-Teachers&#39; in Jordanian Public Universities</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Aust J Teach Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>1&#8211;11</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Ihmeideh FM, Al-Omari AA, Al-Dababneh KA. Attituders toward Communication Skills among Students&#39;-Teachers&#39; in Jordanian Public Universities. Aust J Teach Educ. 2010;35(4):1&#8211;11.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="54">
        <RefAuthor>Power BT</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lennie SC</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Pre-registration dietetic students&#39; attitudes to learning communication skills</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>J Hum Nutr Diet</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>189&#8211;197</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Power BT, Lennie SC. Pre-registration dietetic students&#39; attitudes to learning communication skills. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2012;25(2):189&#8211;197. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-277X.2012.01226.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-277X.2012.01226.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="55">
        <RefAuthor>Colliver JA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Conlee MJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Verhulst SJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dorsey JK</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Reports of the decline of empathy during medical education are greatly exaggerated: a reexamination of the research</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2010</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Acad Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>588&#8211;593</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Colliver JA, Conlee MJ, Verhulst SJ, Dorsey JK. Reports of the decline of empathy during medical education are greatly exaggerated: a reexamination of the research. Acad Med. 2010;85(4):588&#8211;593. DOI: 10.1097&#47;ACM.0b013e3181d281dc</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;ACM.0b013e3181d281dc</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="56">
        <RefAuthor>Batenburg V</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Smal JA</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Lodder A</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>de Melker RA</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Are professional attitudes related to gender and medical specialty&#63;</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1999</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>489&#8211;492</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Batenburg V, Smal JA, Lodder A, de Melker RA. Are professional attitudes related to gender and medical specialty&#63; Med Educ. 1999;33(7):489&#8211;492. DOI: 10.1046&#47;j.1365-2923.1999.00333.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1046&#47;j.1365-2923.1999.00333.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="57">
        <RefAuthor>Dornbush RL</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Singer P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Brownstein EJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Freedman AM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Maintenance of psychosocial attitudes in medical students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>1985</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Soc Sci Med</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>107&#8211;109</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Dornbush RL, Singer P, Brownstein EJ, Freedman AM. Maintenance of psychosocial attitudes in medical students. Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(1):107&#8211;109. DOI: 10.1016&#47;0277-9536(85)90318-1</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1016&#47;0277-9536(85)90318-1</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="58">
        <RefAuthor>Marambe KN</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Edussuriya DH</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dayaratne KM</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Attitudes of Sri Lankan medical students toward learning communication skills</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2012</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Educ Health (Abingdon)</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>165&#8211;171</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Marambe KN, Edussuriya DH, Dayaratne KM. Attitudes of Sri Lankan medical students toward learning communication skills. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2012;25(3):165&#8211;171.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="59">
        <RefAuthor>Shankar RP</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Dubey AK</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Mishra P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Deshpande VY</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Chandrasekhar TS</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Shivananda PG</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Student attitudes towards communication skills training in a medical college in Western Nepal</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2006</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Educ Health (Abingdon)</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>71&#8211;84</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Shankar RP, Dubey AK, Mishra P, Deshpande VY, Chandrasekhar TS, Shivananda PG. Student attitudes towards communication skills training in a medical college in Western Nepal. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2006;19(1):71&#8211;84.</RefTotal>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="60">
        <RefAuthor>Austin EJ</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Evans P</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Magnus B</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>O&#39;Hanlon K</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>A preliminary study of empathy, emotional intelligence and examination performance in MBChB students</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2007</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Med Educ</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>684&#8211;689</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Austin EJ, Evans P, Magnus B, O&#39;Hanlon K. A preliminary study of empathy, emotional intelligence and examination performance in MBChB students. Med Educ. 2007;41(7):684&#8211;689. DOI: 10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.2007.02795.x</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1111&#47;j.1365-2923.2007.02795.x</RefLink>
      </Reference>
      <Reference refNo="61">
        <RefAuthor>Beaton DE</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Bombardier C</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Guillemin F</RefAuthor>
        <RefAuthor>Ferraz MB</RefAuthor>
        <RefTitle>Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures</RefTitle>
        <RefYear>2000</RefYear>
        <RefJournal>Spine</RefJournal>
        <RefPage>3186&#8211;3191</RefPage>
        <RefTotal>Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186&#8211;3191. DOI: 10.1097&#47;00007632-200012150-00014</RefTotal>
        <RefLink>http:&#47;&#47;dx.doi.org&#47;10.1097&#47;00007632-200012150-00014</RefLink>
      </Reference>
    </References>
    <Media>
      <Tables>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>1</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">1en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">1de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 1: Overview CSAS surveys (Reference numbers as cited in the reference list).</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Tabelle 1: &#220;berblick CSAS-Studien</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>2</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">2en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">2de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 2: Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS)</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Tabelle 2: CSAS-G</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>3</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">3en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">3de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 3: Demographic characteristics of the study sample in absolute numbers and proportions (in parentheses).</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Tabelle 3: Demographie der Gesamtkohorte</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>4</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">4en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">4de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 4: Rotated component matrix. </Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Tabelle 4: Rotierte Komponentenmatrix</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>5</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">5en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">5de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 5: Single factor variance analyses: Comparison of attitudinal scores in relation to year of study.</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Tabelle 5: Einfaktorielle Varianzanalyse zum Vergleich PAS- und NAS-Scores im ersten, zweiten und vierten Studienjahr</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <Table format="png">
          <MediaNo>6</MediaNo>
          <MediaID language="en">6en</MediaID>
          <MediaID language="de">6de</MediaID>
          <Caption language="en"><Pgraph><Mark1>Table 6: Multiple regression.</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
          <Caption language="de"><Pgraph><Mark1>Tabelle 6: Multiple Regressionsanalyse</Mark1></Pgraph></Caption>
        </Table>
        <NoOfTables>6</NoOfTables>
      </Tables>
      <Figures>
        <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures>
      </Figures>
      <InlineFigures>
        <NoOfPictures>0</NoOfPictures>
      </InlineFigures>
      <Attachments>
        <NoOfAttachments>0</NoOfAttachments>
      </Attachments>
    </Media>
  </OrigData>
</GmsArticle>